Addressing False Doctrines

The Gospel of Luke, Chapter 5 – Christogenea on Talkshoe, June 22nd, 2012 (in part): Last week discussing Luke chapter 4, it was made evident in more than one way that the “devil” of the temptation of Christ was most certainly an actual person. While many may believe that Satan is still in heaven, as the Romish Catholics would like for us to believe, Christ said “I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven”, and He was speaking in the past tense.

 The moral to the story is: Don’t send your preacher or priest on an errand to the grocery store, for it’s hard to tell what he might come back with! In some ways, this paper parallels my essay Clergy Claims God Committed Fraud. It is sad, but all of this lack of Biblical comprehension on the part of the Clergy is quite appalling, to say the least! In particular, we are referring to Matt. 13:24-30, 36-42 where the “TARES” and “WHEAT” are addressed by Christ. At Matt. 25: 30-34, Christ speaks of the “SHEEP” and the “GOATS”. These four terms are deliberately cloaked in idiomatic language, called “parables”, and unless we grasp what a parable is, we will never identify what the parable is teaching! At Matt. 13:34-35 and Mark 4:33-34 the subject of “parables” is elaborated on, stating:

Matt. 13:34-35: “³⁴ All these things spake Yahshua unto the multitude in parables [G3850]; and without a parable [G3850] spake he not unto them: ³⁵ That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables [G3850]; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world.”

Mark 4:33-34: “³³ And with many such parables [G3850] spake he the word unto them, as they were able to hear it. ³⁴ But without a parable [G3850] spake he not unto them: and when they were alone, he expounded all things to his disciples.”

Although the syllable “shem” is in the Hashemite family name of King Hussein of Jordan, it is no sign that he qualifies for any rank, if indeed he is a descendant of Abraham! We find a concise genealogical record of the Hashemite family on the Internet at:

kinghussein.gov.hash_inhtmljo/http://wwwtro:

“The Hashemite royal family is interwoven into the life of Jordan, having established the modern state in 1921. It is impossible, therefore, to understand the fabric of Jordan’s modern history without some knowledge of the royal family. The Hashemites, or “Bani Hashem,” are descendants of the Arab chieftain Quraysh, a descendant of the Prophet Ismail, himself the son of the Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham). Quraysh first came to the holy city of Mecca during the second century CE. The first generation of Quraysh to rule the city came six generations later, when Qusayy bin Kilab ascended to the leadership of Mecca in the year 480 CE. The name ‘Hashem’ is actually that of Qusayy’s grandson, who was the great-grandfather of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). The Hashemites are thus the direct descendants of the Prophet through his daughter Fatima and her husband Ali bin Abi Talib, who was also the Prophet’s paternal first cousin and the fourth caliph of Islam.”

With this fifth paper, I will first show the reader that Nord Davis developed an undeserving congenial stance toward king Hussein of Jordan as being a pureblooded Shemite. Secondly, I will present the real facts to the contrary. First, here’s Nord’s scenario:

Desert Shield, pt. 5, “The Men of Nineveh”, Nord Davis:

“Friday, January 11th was the Islamic weekly holy day, and all government agencies are closed. Most stores are closed, but there are enough Christian Arabs so that Friday presents no problem for the tourist. Frustrated because of the shortage of time until Bush’s deadline of the 15th, we decided to take a tour of the Dead Sea. What is there to learn from this ancient landmark? I stood on the shore of the Dead Sea and looked at the Zionist-occupied ‘west bank’. What is so strange in the way this place feels? It is peaceful, yet ominous. I told my feelings to my instructor and he asked me if I knew what was at the bottom of the Dead Sea. I did not know. What is at the bottom of any lake, which is really all the Dead Sea is? The ancient cities of Sodom and Gomorrah lie at the very bottom after a volcano in southern Syria erupted and spewed forth rock and lava to dam up the Jordan River and flood the cities once and for all. For thousands of years, those filthy rotten cities have been soaking in brine and still they are not cleansed!

With this fourth paper, it will be demonstrated that Nord Davis, not having all the pieces to the puzzle, developed a flawed point of view. Had he the documentation that Mohammed’s mother was a jewess, I am quite sure he would not have taken it upon himself to approach king Hussein of Jordan. Because of this, we have to question much of what he wrote in his part #3 of Desert Shield. Nevertheless, much of what he teaches, I agree with. To nail down securely the fact that Mohammed’s mother was a bad-fig-jew, I found another witness on the Internet at:

sdadefend.com/History/jihad3.htm

“The Origin Of Jihad, The Legacy Of Mohammed

“Although his mother, Amina, was a Jewess who had been converted to Christianity, we do not know the kind of instruction she had given the boy before she died, when he was six. Yet it must have been a fair amount; for Mohammed’s dictations, as later compiled into the Koran, contain many things which parallel information in the Old Testament (although less in the New). At any rate, it is likely that his Christian mother had been the strongest religious influence in his formative years.”

There may be some who are wondering whether or not I have permission to reproduce large portions of Nord Davis’ Desert Storm [DS] and his fifteen Star Wars lessons, but on page 49 of Desert Storm, he points out that his publication is not copyrighted and may be reproduced freely, as long as he is given credit. My object is to set the record straight, as Nord was forging political alliances with Canaanites which are forbidden by Israelite law, based upon a couple of his flawed premises, making it hazardous for the rest of us. By-and-large, I approve of much of what Nord taught, especially on Two Seedline. With that said, I will continue with Davis on page 47:

Desert Shield, “Jonah’s Sign”, part 2, by Nord Davis:

“We have had evidence that an American involvement in war was being planned for the Middle East since 1985. Our Northpoint intelligence sources were supplying us with bits and fragments of data pointing strongly in that direction for the past three years. For instance, one of our Team Members is Capt. Ted Jablonski, who was an officer on the SS Austral Rainbow, TAK 1005. This is a private, merchant marine cargo ship whose ownership can be traced back to the Bush Family. There are twelve such vessels that are sister ships in the same corporation. As early as three years ago, these ships were loaded with tank ammunition, medical and food supplies, and thousands of other items necessary to wage a ground war in the desert. These ships were anchored at Diego Garcia, an island off the Persian Gulf, waiting for the ‘incident’ that would bring America into a war there. We knew that the Bush Administration had asked the Pakistan Government if they could station 50,000 troops there in early July and were refused by the lady President. We also knew that the tensions between the various Middle Eastern nations were at an all-time high and that there were conflicting loyalties, hidden animosities going back for generations, and the everpresent dichotomy between Islam and Zionism with the local Christian populations siding with Islam and the western Christian populations siding with the Zionist cause. To most of the world, these riddles are cloaked in deliberate confusion, and any solutions offered are at once suspect or dismissed. We also know that the American Government is openly and officially on the Zionist side and promoting the Zionist agenda.

So the reader can understand my motive for writing this series of papers, it is absolutely necessary for one to have all of the issues so one will come to a proper conclusion of my purpose. While Nord did quite well in many areas of his teachings, there are a couple of places where he fell into error, which we are all capable of. With this series, I will address two places where he didn’t perform his usual good scholarship: (1) he used the wrong Hebrew word to support the Biblical “beast of the field”, and (2) he misidentified king Hussein of Jordan as being pureblooded, whereas the king was related to Mohammed whose mother was a bad-fig-jewess of the Cain satanic seedline.

In order to do a critical review of how he came to these erroneous conclusions, I will reproduce in this and future issues his three part essay entitled:

Desert Shield, “Jonah’s Sign”, part 1, by Nord Davis:

“An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas ...”

I have a lot of respect for the late Nord Davis’ Two Seedline Israel Identity teachings, but there are a couple of areas where I cannot give him acclaim. I have his 64 page 1990 8½x11 inch format booklet, Desert Shield. In it he promoted king Hussein of Jordan as being a pureblooded Shemite, but his own words betray him on page 54 thusly:

In my Ron Wyatt, Honest?, Or Deceitful Fraud #3, I presented the historical interpretation of the “mark of the beast” at Rev. 13:18, and there were a few who objected, implying that it had to be something in the future! Biblical prophecy is based on a day equaling a year. A time = 360 years; a month = 30 years; and a day = one year. So if the “beast” is going to reign “forty and two months” at Rev. 13:5, that would amount to (30x42), or 1260 years. Therefore, if the tribulation were to last seven years, starting at 2010, that would take us to the year 3270 A.D., not seven calendar years!

For some background on this subject, in 1887, Dr. H. Grattan Guinness, DD., F.R.A.S., English scholar, preacher, lecturer and writer, wrote a work entitled Romanism and the Reformation – From the Standpoint of Prophecy. This book was republished in 1967, and within its pages he dedicated three chapters to pre-Reformation historical interpretation. Before the Reformation there was no other viewpoint. To impress this upon the minds of his readers, he quoted from scores of writers, historians and preachers who subjected prophecy to historical analysis for its interpretation. Portions from his works bear repeating for this study. The following excerpt is a quotation from Lecture 5, pages 112-113, as appeared in Old Fashioned Prophecy Magazine, Blackwood, New Jersey, [hereinafter “G’sR&R”]:

“With many varieties as to detail we find there have existed, and still exist, two great opposite schools of interpretation, the Papal and the Protestant, or the futurist and the historical. The latter regards the prophecies of Daniel, Paul, and John as fully and faithfully setting forth the entire course of Christian history; the former as dealing chiefly with a future fragment of time at its close.”