Watchman's Teaching Letter #219 July 2016

This is my two hundred and nineteenth monthly teaching letter and continues my nineteenth year of publication. At this juncture, I have decided to continue to do critical reviews of Howard B. Rand’s ministerial writings from his books, tracts and especially those found in his Destiny Magazine.The many issues of Destiny Magazines had several guest writers of varying degrees of excellence.

I will inform the reader at the outset that I only rate Rand and his associate writers about 50%. However, the 50% that they get correct is simply outstanding. I would also advise the reader, if one can find any of their original printed articles, to check my edited articles against the original publications. My position is, if anyone who has put anything into writing or speech, they are fair game for a critical review, as it best serves our kinsmen in the faith, and this is what I will be doing with Rand and his associated group of writers.

The following article, A Color-Blind Era written by C.R. Dicky, appeared in Rand’s Destiny Magazine, June, 1962, yearbook pp. 129-130 (editing and emphases in brackets):

A Color-Blind Era

An Associated Press Release from Victoria Falls, Rhodesia, dated February 18, 1960, reads in part as follows:

Evangelist Billy Graham, resting here after an intensive 5-week tour of West Africa, said he is not leading a crusade against the color bar.

“‘Before I can preach about color in Africa, we must apply Christ in the United States,’ Graham said.

“‘Race barriers will ultimately have to end,’ Graham added, ‘but I cannot presume to suggest a solution of Rhodesia’s and the [South African] Union’s problem, because we have our own problem in the States.’

However, he declared, ‘I don’t see how the South African approach (of rigid segregation) can possibly work.’ Graham said he thinks economic, political and spiritual partnership would be a better approach.

“‘Christ was not a European,’ he said, ‘He wasn’t fair skinned. I should say he was swarthy’.’

First, let it be said that we have no desire to minimize the tremendous influence and outreach of Evangelist Billy Graham’s work. Perhaps no other evangelist in Christian history has awakened so many people to their need of the saving power of Jesus Christ [??? C.A.E.]. Therefore, it is surprising, to say the least, to find him teaching that Christ ‘wasn’t [FAIR] skinned – but [SWARTHY].’

It would be interesting to know where he finds a statement in the Bible to support such a belief. Holy men of [Yahweh] wrote as they were moved by the Spirit in regard to the racial background of Jesus [sic Yahshua]. The lineage of His mother has been carefully recorded, even to the color of skin, so there is no excuse for confusion on this important subject. Here are some facts as recorded in the Scriptures. The genealogy of Jesus [sic Yahshua] Christ, as recorded by Matthew, begins as follows:

“‘The book of the generation of Jesus [sic Yahshua] Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren.... And Jesse begat David the king.... And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus [Yahshua] who is called Christ. So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations’.” (Matt. 1:1-17.)

This record clearly traces the lineage of Jesus [sic Yahshua] back to Abraham and Sarah, Isaac and Rebekah. What kind of people were they? Are there any clues as to whether these prominent people in that early day were a dark-colored race, or of [FAIR] complexion? We believe that there is ample evidence in the Scriptures. For example, it is written in Genesis 12:10-14:

“‘And there was a famine in the land: and Abram went down into Egypt to sojourn there; for the famine was grievous in the land. And it came to pass, when he was come near to enter into Egypt, that he said unto Sarai his wife, Behold now, I know that thou art a [FAIR] woman to look upon: Therefore it shall come to pass, when the Egyptians shall see thee, that they shall say, This is his wife: and they will kill me, but they will save thee alive. Say, I pray thee, that thou art my sister: that it may be well with me for thy sake; and my soul shall live because of thee. And it came to pass, that, when Abram was come into Egypt, the Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very [FAIR]’.” [Gen. 12:10-14:]

Thus we learn that Sarah – mother of Isaac, and mother of the Saxon Race – was NOT[SWARTHY]’ but ‘very [FAIR].’ (See Genesis 21:12: ‘... In Isaac shall thy seed be called,’ or named. Amos, chapter 7, heralds this change by referring to the ten tribes as the House of Isaac.)

When Abraham was old and failing in health, he sent his chief servant on a journey to find a wife for Isaac. Abraham said to the servant:

“‘I will make thee swear by [Yahweh], the [Almighty] of heaven, and the [Almighty] of the earth, that thou shalt not take a wife unto my son of the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I dwell: but thou shalt go unto my country, and to my kindred, and take a wife unto my son Isaac’ (Gen. 24:3-4).

An interracial marriage for Isaac was strictly banned. So the servant made his way to Mesopotamia, and the city where Abraham’s brother Nahor lived. He neared the city at evening time and prepared to water his camels. Finding this to be the place where the women went to draw water, the servant was led to pray this prayer:

“‘... O [Yahweh Almighty] of my master Abraham, I pray thee, send me good speed this day, and shew kindness unto my master Abraham. Behold, I stand here by the well of water; and the daughters of the men of the city come out to draw water: And let it come to pass, that the damsel to whom I shall say, Let down thy pitcher, I pray thee, that I may drink; and she shall say, Drink, and I will give thy camels drink also: let the same be she that thou hast appointed for thy servant Isaac; and thereby shall I know that thou hast shewed kindness unto my master.’

“‘And it came to pass, before he had done speaking, that, behold, Rebekah came out, who was born to Bethuel, son of Milcah, the wife of Nahor, Abraham’s brother, with her pitcher upon her shoulder. And the damsel was[VERY FAIR] to look upon ....”’ (Gen. 24:12-16).

In this manner, Isaac, son of the FAIR and beautiful Sarah, took as his wife the [‘VERY FAIR’] and lovely Rebekah. Here, in this important moment of history, we find the beginning of a [FAIR-SKINNED] Covenant Race which was to emerge ‘in the latter days’ as [Yahweh’s] Chosen People of prophecy and history – the AngloSaxon-Celtic and kindred Christian nations around the world. What a wonderful story it is for those who can read simple Bible facts with understanding!

King Saul reigned for a time over Israel. But it was David who was chosen by [Yahweh] to establish His throne in Israel.

“‘He (David) shall build an house for my name, and I will stablish the throne of his kingdom for ever.... thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever.’ (2 Sam. 7:13, 16.)

What manner of man was David? When Samuel was sent by [Yahweh] to anoint a king in Israel, after the death of Saul, he rejected seven of Jesse’s sons. Then he inquired, ‘Are here all thy children?’ Jesse said, ‘There remaineth yet the youngest, and, behold, he keepeth the sheep.’ And Samuel said unto Jesse, ‘Send and fetch him: for we will not sit down till he come hither’ (1 Sam. 16:11). David was brought in and the scene closes with these words:

“‘... Now he (David) was [RUDDY], and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to. And [Yahweh] said, Arise, anoint him: for this is he. Then Samuel took the horn of oil, and anointed him in the midst of his brethren: and the Spirit of [Yahweh] came upon David from that day forward.’ (1 Sam. 16:12-13.)

In the account of David’s challenge of Goliath, we find this interesting statement:

“‘And the Philistine came on and drew near unto David; and the man that bare the shield went before him. And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him; for he was but a youth, and [RUDDY], and of a [FAIR] countenance.’ (1 Sam. 17:41-42.)

It is written in 2 Samuel 14:27:

“‘And unto Absalom (one of David’s sons) there were born three sons, and one daughter, whose name was Tamar: she was a woman of a [FAIR] countenance.’

The genealogies of Matthew’s first chapter, and Luke’s third, leave no doubt concerning the fact that both Mary, the mother of Jesus [sic Yahshua], and Joseph, her husband, were the descendants of King David. Is it reasonable to suppose that a Covenant Race, which was so carefully guarded in its beginning, would be allowed to disintegrate, lose its identity, and become a darkskinned race by the time of our Lord’s birth in Bethlehem? Both prophecy and history verify the lineage of Jesus [sic Yahshua] the Christ through Abraham, David, and His mother Mary, as we have seen in the record.

Here are two more interesting statements on the subject of color:

Job 42:15: ‘In all the land were no women found so [FAIR] as the daughters of Job: and their father gave them inheritance among their brethren.’

Acts 7:17-21: ‘But when the time of the promise drew nigh, which [the Almighty] had sworn to Abraham, the people grew and multiplied in Egypt, Till another king arose, which knew not Joseph. The same dealt subtilly with our kindred, and evil entreated our fathers, so that they cast out their young children, to the end that they might not live. In which time Moses was born, and was [EXCEEDINGLY FAIR], and nourished up in his father’s house three months: and when he was cast out, Pharaoh’s daughter took him up, and nourished him for her own son.’

[Critical review showing my writings concerning “the Pharaoh’s daughter:

From Watchman’s Teaching Letter #37 for May, 2001, I addressed more of this story thusly: To start with, in a quote from the book The Boehm Journey To Egypt, Land Of Tutankhamun by Frank J. Cosentino, page 120, we read this:

It will be recalled that Hatshepsut was the first great queen of Egypt. She married Thutmosis II and after his death seized the throne from Thutmosis III, who after Hatshepsut’s demise was to become one of Egypt’s greatest warrior-kings. To secure her name in history and to prove herself equal to all the male pharaohs before her, she embarked on ambitious building programs during her twenty-year rule (1489-1469 B.C.).”

Princess Hatshepsut was the only surviving child of Tuthmosis I and his queen. As there is no word in the ancient Egyptian language for “queen”, the meaning was simply “king’s great wife.” Had Tuthmosis I had a son, he would have been in line to inherit the throne from his father. With Hatshepsut being a female, and no others contending for the throne, it could pass through her to whomever she might marry. There was a major flaw in this arrangement, as it left an opening for non-royal blood to gain the throne. In the Eighteenth Egyptian Dynasty this happened several times. In fact, Tuthmosis II, the half-brother whom Hatshepsut married, is a case in point. The exact system of choosing a new king is not precisely known, but, in the 18th Dynasty, it seems that if there was no son to receive the honor, it was passed on through the oldest female, and in turn to her husband. The difference in the case with Hatshepsut is that she took the throne herself after her husband died. It was probably a matter of guardianship at first, until Tuthmosis III became of age, but Hatshepsut evidently decided to remain on the throne, denying Tuthmosis III his seat. In the end, this precipitated a bitter battle between Hatshepsut and Tuthmosis III.

In Egypt, the pharaoh often had many wives, and in some cases married a half-sister. All this made the process of passing on the throne rather complex. Upon the death of Tuthmosis I, his son Tuthmosis II, by a minor wife, was married to his half-sister, Hatshepsut. By marrying Hatshepsut, it established Tuthmosis II’s right to the throne which lasted for twenty-two unexceptional years. When Tuthmosis II died, he left a daughter by Hatshepsut and a son, Tuthmosis III, by a minor wife. Hatshepsut then ruled seven years as regent for the young boy. After this time, Hatshepsut took it upon herself to change her title from “Queen” to “King.”

Further, from Watchman’s Teaching Letter #40 for August, 2001, I stated:

This is the lady (Hatshepsut) that would have had all the incentive for adopting Moses into the Pharaoh’s household. I covered the lady Pharaoh Hatshepsut to a great extent in both lessons #32 and #37. In lessons #31 and 32, I explained how Moses’ name was derived from the line of pharaohs whose names ended in “mosis”, like in Kamose, Amosis, Tuthmosis I, Tuthmosis II, Tuthmosis III, etc. Surely this is not just a coincidence, for several historians have observed this similarity of names. As Moses was adopted by pharaoh’s daughter, surely he would receive the pharaoh’s family name. Hatshepsut’s unique position in Egyptian history makes her a very good candidate for being the one rescuing Moses from a watery grave.

If you will remember, Hatshepsut was the last of a line having purely royal blood in the House of Pharaoh. We can also be pretty sure that she was of the line of Shem. If you will also remember, the Bible narrative relates that the Egyptian pharaoh gave Joseph his wife. We also know that Joseph’s wife was of the House of Shem, for her father was a priest of On. On was called “Beth Shemesh”, meaning House of the people of Shem. Unless the pharaoh that gave Joseph his wife was also of the House of Shem, he wouldn’t have had the authority to do so. At this point, I will relate to you what one of my proofreaders pointed out in one of his letters to me on this subject:

Concerning Beth-Shemesh, and we may have discussed this, and from your letters certainly you see it, but I am compelled to discuss it again here. ‘Shemesh’, I am convinced is surely a double-entendre. For the word means ‘sun’ in Hebrew, obvious from the Greek translation ‘Heliopolis’ which means ‘city (polis) of the sun (helios)’, but also, and just as well in palaeo Hebrew, means ‘people of Shem.’ For the people of Shem are the ‘light of the world’ (Matt. 5:14), and just like the ancient Pharaohs, Yahshua is represented as the source of light, Rev. 21:23; John 1:4-9; 8:12; Rev. 22:16. ....”

In all of my work on Egyptian history, I have never found anyone who has put the 18th Dynasty together the way I have in my back Watchman’s Teaching Letters, along with this paper; that is until today (June 29, 2010). I decided to search for some new data on Egypt that would support my premise, and I hit the jackpot. The reason that I hadn’t discovered this before is because I had acquired it since I did that research. I went to the Libronix Digital Library (which contains hundreds of Bibles, lexicons and commentaries) and typed “Thutmose” into the search. The very first book that came up was The Bible Knowledge Commentary by John F. Walvoord & Roy B. Zuck, and there were 21 hits to open, plus an additional 2 hits from an accompanying book entitled The Bible Reader’s Companion.

To my surprise Walvoord and Zuck were parallel to my findings about 90%, although they and I reached these conclusions independently. I would invite anyone to read their commentary on this subject from their Old Testament volume, pages 103-114, and compare their remarks with mine! Looking back, I am glad I didn’t have their input on this topic from the beginning of my endeavor, as it placed me in a position where I had to do my own research from a cold, emptyhanded start the hard way! It is reassuring to me to find that someone else came to a comparable conclusion.

While my research agrees very well with Walvoord and Zuck, my reason for citing the 18th Egyptian dynasty was altogether different than theirs. Their reasoning follows archaeology and aligns chronologies, which is all well and good, showing excellent scholarship. But the thing that caught my eye was how the Egyptians and Hurrians, along with the Hittites, fought in wars to a standstill, and how the Egyptians made peace treaties with them, and then for political reasons exchanged women for the other party’s harems. This brought Hittite and Hurrian [often errantly Hivite in Scripture] women into the pharaoh’s harem to mix the blood of Cain among the Egyptian rulers.

Here is how The Bible Knowledge Commentary by John F. Walvoord & Roy B. Zuck partially treat the history during the 18th Dynasty in their “Introduction”, pp. 106-107:

... The history of Egypt near the time of the Exodus. Amenhotep I ruled in the newly centralized government from 1546 to 1526 (actually begun by his father Ahmose I) and was succeeded by Thutmose I (who ruled ca. 1526-1512). Moses was born (ca. 1526) in this king’s reign (or at the end of the reign of Amenhotep I). This king’s famous daughter, Hatshepsut, may have been the royal princess who discovered Moses along the Nile. When Thutmose II (1512-1504) died, Thutmose III was very young. So his stepmother, Hatshepsut, contrived to make herself ruler starting in 1503. (Thutmose III is considered king from 1504 to 1482 though Hatshepsut ‘co-reigned’ with him to 1482.)

During Hatshepsut’s brilliant reign Egypt experienced prosperity. In these years Moses spent his youth in the royal court. After Hatshepsut’s death in 1482 Thutmose III ruled alone till 1450. Thutmose III liquidated the entire royal court and attempted to obliterate Hatshepsut’s name from monuments in the land. At that time Moses probably found the court of Egypt inhospitable and fled to Midian. Thutmose III became a powerful kingdom builder, extending his empire to include Syria.

Thutmose III was succeeded by Amenhotep II (1450-1425), the Pharaoh of the Exodus (1446). Unlike his warring father, Amenhotep II seems to have suffered military reverses because he was not able to carry out extensive campaigns. His weak war efforts may have resulted from the loss of all or most of his chariots, in the waters of the Sea of Reeds. The so-called ‘Dream Stela’ of Thutmose IV records that the god Har-em-akht told the young prince in a dream that someday he would be king. If Thutmose IV had been the eldest son, proof of his throne-right would have been unnecessary. It is logical, therefore, to assume that he was a younger son, not the oldest son, of Amenhotep II. This accords with the statement in Exodus 12:29 that the eldest son of Pharaoh died the night of Israel’s first Passover. Thus Thutmose III was the Pharaoh of the oppression and Amenhotep II was the Pharaoh of the Exodus ...”

In my own work, I had identified Thutmose III as the oppressor of Israel, but didn’t go into detail on who the pharaoh of the Exodus was. Inasmuch as Moses fled to Midian for forty years, Amenhotep II would seem to be reasonable as the pharaoh of the Exodus. As to the dates of Walvoord and Zuck, my own dates would be somewhat similar for the 18th dynasty, but I tried to follow the dates of The Penguin Historical Atlas of Ancient Egypt, pp. 133-134, which would place Amenhotep II at 1427-1392 B.C. But in quotations, I would use the dates cited by the author which varied notably. END OF MY CRITICAL REVIEW ON THE PHARAOH THAT KNEW NOT JOSEPH. Back to A Color-Blind Era, written by C.R. Dicky:

Truly ‘blindness in part is happened to Israel,’ as Paul wrote to the Romans in his day. Even to this day [there] are the people the synagogue of Satan is out to destroy, and race mixing is the most effective weapon in his arsenal. It was by this means that the civilization of Noah’s time was destroyed. Read the story in Genesis 6 and weep for the destruction that is coming in the near future to cleanse the earth of unrighteousness once more. [And this was written in 1962 before massive race-mixing got under way in our own time! C.A.E.]

The Apostle Peter tells about it – and warns of the judgment to come. We quote from his Second Epistle, chapters 2 and 3:

“‘For if [Yahweh] spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly; And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly, And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked; ... [Yahweh] knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished.’ (2 Peter 2:4-9.)

“‘Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? For since the fathers fell asleep all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of [Yahweh] the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water; Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished, But the heavens and the earth which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.’ (2 Peter 3:5-7.)

This may be some ‘strange fire’ known only to [Yahweh], or it may be a reference to nuclear warfare which now threatens all nations.

Yes, this is, indeed, a color-blind era. The Covenant Peoples should not downgrade [sic mollycoddle the] other races; neither should they mingle with them indiscriminately, or intermarry with them. The trend now, in the United States, is to place Negroes in high government posts to rule over white citizens. It is a dangerous precedent, and men who so violate Divine law will be held accountable for their evil deeds. Close affinity between the white and dark races would soon destroy the purity of all races. [Note: Only the White race is pure, C.A.E.]

Let us fervently hope that [the so-called] evangelist Billy Graham will read the Bible thoughtfully, from beginning to end, before commenting again publicly on a matter so vital as the racial background and [COLOR] of Jesus [sic Yahshua] the Christ.”

[Critical note by Clifton A. Emahiser: It is a shame, after writing such a great essay, that C.R. Dicky made the closing statement: “The Covenant Peoples should not downgrade other races ...”]

I addressed this same subject in my series It Is Biblical To Be Caucasian, Song. chs. 4-7, #’s 1–5. Here are excerpts from #1:

We will start this essay by quoting Brenton’s Septuagint at Song of Solomon 5:9-12:

9 What is thy kinsman more than another kinsman, O thou beautiful among women? what is thy kinsman more than another kinsman, that thou hast so charged us? 10 My kinsman is white and ruddy, chosen out from myriads. 11 His head is as very fine gold, his locks are flowing, black as a raven. 12 His eyes are as doves, by the pools of [blue] waters, washed with [white] milk, sitting by the pools.”[brackets mine]

The KJV renders this same passage thusly:

9 What is thy beloved [kinsman] more than another beloved [kinsman], O thou fairest3303 among women? what is thy beloved [kinsman] more than another beloved [kinsman], that thou dost so charge us? 10 My beloved [kinsman]is white and ruddy122, the chiefest among ten thousand. 11 His head is as the most fine [white] gold, his locks are bushy, and black as a raven. 12 His eyes are as the eyes of doves by the [blue] rivers of waters, washed with [white] milk, and fitly set.”[brackets mine]

The Hebrew word for “ruddy” here is Strong’s #122: ‘adom {aw-dome´} Meaning:1) red, ruddy (of man, horse, heifer, garment, water, lentils). Origin:from 119: ... to show blood (in the face), i.e., flush or turn rosy ....”

We should also note that the Hebrew word for FAIR is Strong’s #3303, “yapheh … from 3302; beautiful...” When we see the definition for #3302, we see why #3303 is beautiful: “yaphah … a primitive root; properly to be bright, i.e. (by implication) beautiful...” Of course, dark-skinned races cannot be bright, like a star in the night sky.

Benjamin Franklin must have been familiar with that passage, and also possibly with the origin of the Hebrew word for FAIR, for he made a similar statement in his Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind, Peopling of Countries, etc., part 24:

24. Which leads me to add one Remark: That the Number of purely white People in the World is proportionably very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny. America (exclusive of the new Comers) wholly so .... I could wish their Numbers were increased. And while we are, as I may call it, Scouring our Planet, by clearing America of Woods, and so making this Side of our Globe reflect a brighter Light to the Eyes of Inhabitants in Mars or Venus, why should we in the Sight of Superior Beings, darken its People? why increase the Sons of Africa, by Planting them in America, where we have so fair an Opportunity, by excluding all Blacks and Tawneys, of increasing the lovely White and Red? But perhaps I am partial to the Complexion of my Country, for such Kind of Partiality is natural to Mankind ....”

And when Franklin stated: “... in America, where we have so fair an Opportunity, by excluding all Blacks and Tawneys, of increasing the lovely White and Red”, it is evident he was familiar with Song of Solomon 5:9-12. Here, by mentioning: “... the lovely White and Red ...”, Franklin simply meant beautiful White people with rosy cheeks, like the Song Of Solomon, chapters 4 & 5 describe! It should be pointed out here that Benjamin Franklin was one of the leading framers of our United States Constitution, so this sheds light on their intent!....

Excerpts from Song of Solomon, chapter 4, read:

Behold, thou artfair, my love; behold thou artfair; thou hast doves’ eyes within thy locks ... Thy lips are like a thread of scarlet8144, and thy speech comely ... Thy neck is like the tower of David ... Thy two breasts are like two young roes that are twins, which feed among the lilies ... Thou art all fair, my love; there is no spot in thee ... Thou hast ravished my heart, my sister, my spouse ... How fair is thy love, my sister, my spouse! how much better is thy love than wine! ... Thy lips, O my spouse, drop as the honeycomb: honey and milk are under thy tongue ....”

This is why the Brenton’s LXX translates Proverbs 5:15-20 thusly: 15 Drink waters out of thine own vessels, and out of thine own springing wells. 16 Let not waters out of thy fountain be spilt by thee, but let thy waters go into thy streets. 17 Let them be only thine own, and let no stranger partake with thee. 18 Let thy fountain of water be truly thine own; and rejoice with the wife of thy youth. 19 Let thy loving hart and thy graceful colt company with thee, and let her be considered thine own, and be with thee at all times; for ravished with her love thou shalt be greatly increased. 20 Be not intimate with a strange woman, neither fold thyself in the arms of a woman not thine own.”

The KJV renders this same passage: 15 Drink waters out of thine own cistern, and running waters out of thine own well. 16 Let thy fountains be dispersed abroad, and rivers of waters in the streets. 17 Let them be only thine own, and not strangers’ with thee. 18 Let thy fountain be blessed: and rejoice with the wife of thy youth. 19Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love. 20 And why wilt thou, my son, be ravished with a strange woman, and embrace the bosom of a stranger?”

Race-mixing is described by Jeremiah at 2:13 as: “For my people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water.” And then Jeremiah gives a case-in-point in the same chapter, at vv. 21-22 thusly: 21 Yet I had planted thee [Judah] a noble [racially pure] vine, wholly a right seed: how then art thou turned into the degenerate [race-mixed] plant of a strange vine unto me? 22 For though thou wash thee with nitre, and take thee much soap, yet thine iniquity is marked before me, saith Yahweh singular-Elohim.” What we have here is a situation where neither of the terms “sour grapes” nor “broken cisterns” can be taken literally.

Wisdom of Solomon (Apocrypha) 3:15-19:

15 For glorious is the fruit of good labours: and the root of wisdom shall never fall away. 16 As for the children of adulterers, they shall not come to their perfection, and the seed of an unrighteous bed shall be rooted out. 17 For though they live long, yet shall they be nothing regarded: and their last age shall be without honour. 18 Or, if they die quickly, they have no hope, neither comfort on the day of trial. 19 For horrible is the end of the unrighteous generation.”

A Word Of Caution On Song 1:6:

This verse reads in part: “Look not upon me, because I am black ...” This verse is not speaking of being genetically “black”, but rather of having a sun tan, for it continues: “... because the sun hath looked upon me ...” How can anyone claim that Almighty Yahweh in the flesh, as Yahshua Christ, is not an extreme Segregationist?

There is another incident that we haven’t as yet covered; that being Gen. 6:2: “That the sons of heaven saw the daughters of men120 that they were [FAIR]; and they took them wives of all which they chose.”

It is quite clear, here, that the White Adamic antediluvian women were ruddy White all the way back to Eve – Adam’s rightful wife! Therefore, all the racially pure children of Adam and Eve were ruddy White from the very beginning!

We are admonished at Genesis chapter #1 that kind begets kind, time and again. And if Yahweh’s Word is true, ruddy White parents today would continue to birth ruddy White children, generation after generation unless a nigger, or any nonwhite, gets into the woodpile!