Watchman's Teaching Letter #198 October 2014

This is my one hundred and ninety-eighth monthly teaching letter and continues my seventeenth year of publication. Since WTL #137, I have been continuing a series entitled The Greatest Love Story Ever Told, and have been expanding on its seven stages ever since: (1) the courtship, (2) the marriage, (3) the honeymoon, (4) the estrangement, (5) the divorce, (6) the reconciliation, and (7) the remarriage.


THE RECONCILIATION (i.e., Redemption):

Before we proceed much further on “reconciliation” (i.e., redemption), we should address the false teachings of “original sin” and “celibacy”, in order to avoid any misconceptions of true Biblical context. While William Guy Carr was quite an accomplished historian, he drags roman catholic doctrines of “original sin” and “celibacy” into his THE CONSPIRACY To Destroy All Existing Governments And Religions (while at the same time, coming quite close to the truth, though not without error, concerning the Satanic sexual seduction of Eve at Gen. 3:15), pp. 4-9:

... The Luciferians therefore rely upon their ability to lie to and deceive those they plan to enslave body, mind, and soul, into believing anything but the truth. That is the reason Christ referred to the Synagogue of Satan, who direct the Luciferian conspiracy upon this earth as ‘Sons of the Devil, whose lusts ye shall do. He was a murderer from the beginning. He knows not the truth because the truth is not in Him.’ We must also remember that the words ‘Synagogue of Satan’ do not, repeat not, mean the Jews [sic Judahites] because Christ also made it perfectly clear that the Synagogue of Satan ‘Are those who call themselves Jews, but are not, and do lie.’ The Synagogue of Satan is composed of men and women of many nationalities which have their origin in Cain, Eve’s son. My knowledge of the Luciferian Creed has been acquired by reading all the literature I could obtain dealing with the subject and by reading and studying translations of the writings of his Eminence Caroy Rodriguez, Cardinal of Santiago, Chile. I pass on that knowledge in order that you may decide the issue one way or the other.

“The Luciferian Creed teaches that Lucifer was the brightest and most intelligent of the Heavenly host. His power and influence were so great that when he challenged the power and supremacy of God (Adonay) he caused a vast number of higher ranks of celestial beings to defect from God and join him. Among these was Satan, the eldest son of Adonay. According to the Luciferian belief, St. Michael, the Archangel, is Satan’s brother, and the younger son of Adonay. The Luciferian teachings admit that St. Michael defeated those who had espoused the Luciferian Cause in Heaven. This started the eternal enmity between Satan and St. Michael. According to the Luciferian teaching, ‘Hell’ is the word used to designate the celestial world to which God banished Lucifer and the more intelligent of the celestial beings who had followed him of their own free will. According to the Luciferian Creed, God (Adonay) decided to give those creatures He considered had beendeceived into joining the Luciferian revolt, another chance.

He therefore created other worlds including this earth and inhabited them with the less guilty who had defected from Him in heaven at the time of the revolt. He made them in His own image and likeness inasmuch as they were bodies infused with the spiritual light of sanctifying grace. In appearance they looked the same as Christ when he permitted Peter, James and John to see him transfigured. God introduced these fallen angels to the new worlds by a method of birth which deprived them of personal knowledge of their previous existence. He endowed them, however, with an intellect, and gave them the use of a free will. Their minds were so constructed that they could receive inspirations from the celestial world both from those who remained faithful to God and those who had joined the Luciferian Cause. Those on trial are intended to sort out these inspirations by using their intellect. The body puts the decisions of the mind into action. All bodily actions must be either positive or negative.

Every bodily action is recorded in ‘The Book of Life.’ The individual thus decides his eternal future; by his bodily actions he proves if he has accepted God’s plan for the Rule of the Universe or Lucifer’s plan. The results are either ‘Good’ or ‘Evil’.

According to the Luciferian Creed, Lucifer made Satan ‘Prince of this world’ at the time of its creation. His task was to cause our first parents to defect from God (Adonay), and to prevent their progeny from establishing His plan for the Rule of Creation upon this earth. This creed also teaches that God walked in the Garden of Eden (Paradise) without parents instructing them regarding His plan and His way of life. [Note: Satan and his fallen angels were on earth long before the creation of Adam and Eve, C.A.E. edit.] – Back to Carr.

Up to this point there appears no great difference between the teachings of the Luciferian Creed and the Holy Scriptures; the difference begins to appear from the time Satan arrived on the scene. The Luciferian Creed teaches (to the initiates of the lower degrees of the New Palladian Rites, as organized by Albert Pike – of which more later) that God (Adonay) is a jealous and selfish God; He withheld from our first parents knowledge of the pleasures of sexual intercourse – the secret of procreation – because He wished to reserve these pleasures for Himself. This is of course the lie. God simply postponed making His will regarding procreation known to our first parents until He had thoroughly tested their honesty, integrity and obedience, to make sure they were reliable enough to be entrusted with the secret, and worthy enough to perform that holy and sacred function which would give others a chance to accept God’s plan for the rule of creation. Those initiated into the New Palladian Rite are told that Satan bestowed the greatest possible benefaction upon the human race when he initiated Eve into the pleasures of sexual intercourse, thus making known to her the secret of procreation. The Holy Scriptures tell us that Satan caused her to disobey God (‘Of the tree of knowledge thou shall not eat.’) by promising her that if she accepted his advances, both she and Adam would be made equal in power to God and never know death. In other words, Satan introduced Eve to the Luciferian ideology regarding sex and sexual relations (carnal knowledge) which are diametrically opposed to God’s intentions; the act of procreation was to be performed by one man and one woman united for life in the bonds of matrimony. The ritual was to be performed in strict privacy; the love-play was to be based on mutual expressions of joy, appreciation, devotion and gratitude each showed for the other. The climax was to be reached by the spiritual desire of both parties to promote God’s plan for the habitation of the world by creating another being who would grow up to love, honour and obey God so as to live happily with Him forever.

Satan’s conquest of Eve was an entirely different matter, as it is re-enacted in the ritual of the Adonaicide Mass (Black Mass). According to the ritual in this Mass, Satan’s love-play was calculated to arouse the animal passions in Eve to the point when the gratification of the sexual urge overcame all other considerations. He taught her to be voluptuous instead of modest and restrained; to be promiscuous instead of constant to her spouse; to engage in exhibitionism instead of observing strict privacy; to enter into perversions and indulge in excesses instead of moderation. According to Satanism it is perfectly normal to use any medium to gratify the sexual urge, regardless whether it be animal or human. The Babylonian Talmud, (based on the Cabalistic teachings of the promoters of the Luciferian conspiracy), teaches it is perfectly proper for a man to use children as young as three years of age to satisfy his diabolical animal passions. The Luciferian Creed claims Cain was born as the result of the union between Satan and Eve. Knowing these horrors regarding sex are according to the Luciferian ideology, we can recognize the Satanic influence which inspires such ideas. But it is hard to understand how ministers of Christian denominations can expound the following theories regarding the marriage act.

Recently we read in Church publications, which voice the opinions of the leaders of two different denominations, that it is perfectly right and proper for a married couple to engage in sexual intercourse anywhere convenient; at any time (including the menstrual period) and in any position, providing the act terminates in the way which permits of conception. After reading this abominable advice we concluded the authors had undoubtedly kept their vows of celibacy! There is a vast difference between sexual indulgence for the sake of merely gratifying the animal passions and the holy sacred relationship entered into by a man with his wife who is, and remains, pure in body, mind and soul. Gratifying animal passion is gross, aggressive, often perverted and sadistic. The act of love and affection performed between a man and his wife in love with one another is a holy and sacred ritual which is truly termed ‘A Sacrament’.

Under the influence of the Illuminati’s propaganda far too many individuals have entered the marriage contract for the purpose of legalizing sexual relations. Many marriages are nothing but legalized prostitution; still more marriages are marriages of convenience. Is it any wonder then, that we humans are born with the stain of Original Sin? We are conceived in sin because the act of procreation is not in accordance with the will of God, but in keeping with the perversions introduced by Satan when he seduced Eve. God in His anger with our first parents withdrew the light of sanctifying grace from their bodies; because of their sin they were reduced from the status of immortals to mortals and were condemned to suffer privations, physical suffering, sickness and death. But God, in His mercy and goodness, through His beloved son, Jesus Christ, gave us another chance to reject the Luciferian ideology as taught by Satanists, and accept His plan for the rule of creation.

If what we explain is not the truth, then why does the Roman Catholic Church put such great importance on the dogma of the Immaculate conception of Mary the mother of Jesus Christ? The Roman Catholic Faith requires all its members to believe that Mary is the only human being born without the stain of original sin because she conceived of the Holy Ghost in accordance with God’s plan for the process of procreation.

If Satan hadn’t used a perverted version of the sexual relationship to wean Adam and Eve away from God, then why is it that the Skoptsi have practiced self-emasculation since before the advent of Christ, and still emasculate themselves, in order to prove that they reject sex as introduced to the human race in its perverted form by Satan. The Skoptsi believe that only by emasculating themselves can they devote themselves one hundred percent to the service of Almighty God and the establishing of His plan for the rule of creation upon this earth.

The Skoptsi scoff at ministers and priests of the Christian religion who are afraid to emasculate themselves so they can render perfect service to Almighty God. Christ’s apostles were often asked by those who wished to become their disciples if self-emasculation was mandatory. St. Matthew deals with this very delicate question in Chapter 10:7-12. Verse 12 reads ‘For there are eunuchs which were made eunuchs of men; and there be eunuchs which have made themselves eunuchs for the Kingdom of Heaven’s sake. He who is able to receive it let him receive it.’

Note: Ref. is to ‘this extraordinary sacrifice.’ - [Carr’s] - Ed.

Dealing with this same subject St. Paul told his followers that it is better for human beings to renounce sexual relationship, as based on the perverted version of sexual relationship, separates many human beings from Almighty God that caused [1] Thessalonians 4:1-7 to be written into the Holy Scriptures ‘Brethren, even as you have learned from us how you ought to walk, and to please God – as indeed you are walking – we beseech and exhort you, in the Lord Jesus, to make even greater progress. For you know what precepts I have given to you by the Lord Jesus. For this is the will of God; your sanctification; that you abstain from immorality; that everyone of you learn how to possess his vessel in holiness and honor, not in the passion of lust like the gentiles (Luciferians or Satanists) who do not know God – for God has not called us into uncleaness, but unto holiness in Christ Jesus our Lord.’

It is on this premise that St. Augustine bases his opinion that it was the perversion of the sexual relationship, as intended by Almighty God, coupled with disobedience by Adam and Eve to His law and revealed plan for the rule of Creation, aggravated by a display of lack of Faith in His perfections and infinite goodness which constitutes Original Sin.

Once this great truth is accepted and understood it is a simple matter to understand how the continuing Luciferian conspiracy has been developed on this earth, for the purpose of enslaving the survivors of the Human Race*, body, mind and soul. (It also explains the current flood of sex appeal by radio; TV; pornographic pictures; lewd displays of the female figure; sexy song – Presley rhythm – rock and roll). *(ed. “human race” bad choice of label for White Adamic Man.)

Voltaire wrote that; In order to lead the masses into new subjection the Illuminati must lie to them like the Devil himself, not timidly or for a time only, but boldly and always. He told his fellow Illuminists: ‘We must make them lavish promises and use extravagant phrases... The opposite of what we promise, may be done afterwards ... that is of no consequence.’ .

It is on the premise that a human being can’t indulge his sexual desires, and serve God efficiently, that causes the Roman Catholic Church to require those who seek Holy Orders to take the vow of chastity and celibacy. But most revealing of all is the fact that the knowledge of the terrible and tremendous influence sex, as taught by Satanism, has over the lives of its adepts, that some men who have been admitted as High Priests of the Luciferian Creed have emasculated themselves, or ordered their doctors to emasculate them, to prevent sexual considerations interfering with their determination to establish the Luciferian totalitarian dictatorship upon this earth. According to reliable sources of information Kadar is one such person.

One of America’s leading magazines, late in 1956, published the story of how Kadar took over in Hungary and put an end to the abortive uprising. The author claimed Kadar had been emasculated by his enemies while in their custody. That statement is a lie. Kadar was castrated by his own physician at his own request. He wished to become a perfect adept of the Luciferian Cause.

Kadar is such a fanatic that, after he had suppressed the Hungarian revolt, he ordered 45,000 Hungarian youths, who had been taken prisoners, to be emasculated. He then sent them to special camps where they have been trained to become Agentur of the Illuminati to be used to develop the Luciferian conspiracy in its final phase. This is all very horrible, but true. N.B.B. stated in 1956 that the Hungarian revolt had been organized by the Illuminati outside Hungary and that its purpose was to test out in actual practice the feasibility of Pike’s plan to provoke the final social cataclysm between people controlled by Atheistic-Communists, and those who profess Christianity. Evidence since received proves we were absolutely correct in our contentions.

The Luciferian Creed teaches that the Luciferian conspiracy advanced at such a pace that God decided to send St. Michael [to] earth, in the form of Jesus Christ, to halt the conspiracy and rout those who comprised the Synagogue of Satan; it also teaches that St. Michael (Christ) failed in His mission. Pike built up the ceremon[y] of the Adonaicide Mass around the seduction of Eve by Satan, the Luciferian’s victory over Christ, and His death at the instigation of the Illuminati.

Christ did come to redeem us by setting us free from the bonds of Satan with which we are bound. He told us Satan had obtained control over all those in high places in government, religion, the scii ences and social services. His birth in a stable proves to us that if we wish to establish God’s plan for the rule of Creation upon this earth, we must start at the bottom to educate the majority of mankind. Christ made it abundantly clear that it was hopeless, and useless, to even try to start at the top. Acceptance of this lesson will create a spiritual revolution! ....” End of quoting Carr.

Celibacy”, in part, from the 9th edition of the 1894 Encyclopedia Britannica, vol. 5, pp. 254-255:

.... The ideas which, in the absence of or in opposition to the deductions of social philosophers and legislators, have found expression in the religious or ecclesiastical observances and theories of various ages and creeds, require and are fitted to be treated, though with the utmost brevity, in a somewhat more historical manner. Beausobre, in his Histoire Critique du Manichéisme, lib. vii. cap: 3; shows that it was a prevalent opinion; among the earliest Christians that if Adam had not fallen by disobedience, he would have lived for ever in a state of virgin purity, and that a race of sinless beings would have peopled Paradise, produced by some less objectionable means, than the union of the first pair of mortals. Marriage was considered by them as a consequence of the Fall, the brand of the imperfection it had entailed, and a tolerated admission of an impure and sinful nature. To abstain from it, therefore, was the triumph of sanctity and at the same time the proof and the means of spiritual perfection. The earliest aspirants to this perfection among the Christians were not ecclesiastics as such, but hermits, and anchorites, who adopted this among other means of attaining to recognizedly exceptional sanctity. It is not true, as is often stated; that the official expositors of Romanist theology and ecclesiastical law maintain that a vow of perpetual celibacy was required as a condition of ordination in the earliest ages of the church. It is fully admitted by them that, ‘although celibacy is preferable to matrimony, the divine law does not make it necessary for the reception of holy orders, or forbid either the ordination of married men or the marriage of those already in orders.’ In fact it would be impossible to maintain the reverse without denying the truth of many portions of ecclesiastical history, which the church cannot afford to spare, as to the conduct and lives of many of the early bishops, confessors, and martyrs, and without running very serious risk of damaging the favorite claim of the church to uninterrupted apostolical succession. [underlining for emphasis of false premises mine]

It was proposed in the second Council of Carthage, (251) that celibacy should be required in candidates for the priesthood; but it cannot be pretended that even from that time it was always considered necessary: Moroni (Dict. Storico Eccles., vol. ii, p. 58) makes a very much modified statement:– ‘As regards the usage and laws of the church,’ he says, ‘it has never been permitted to priests or to bishops to take wives, when they had declared at the time of their ordination that they would persevere in celibacy.’ It must be observed, however, with regard to the citations of the cases of bishops and priests of the early Greek Church, that Romanist ecclesiastical writers have never pretended that the practice of the Greek Church was not much more lax in this respect than that of the Latin or Western Church. The difference between the discipline of the one and the other was this. In the Greek Church no objection was made to the ordination of married men purposing to continue living with their wives, if these wives were their first wives, and had not before their marriage been widows; whereas, as is claimed by Romanist writers, in the Latin Church neither priests’ nor bishops’ orders were ever conferred on married men without requiring from them and from their wives reciprocal consent; and a solemn promise, that they would live separately during the remainder of their lives. As regards bishops, however, the practice in the Greek Church was the same as in the Latin. The decrees of various councils, however, show that the practice of the Greek Church in this respect was by no means settled and uniform. That of Ancyra in 313 permitted marriage only to such deacons as had protested against accepting the obligation of celibacy at the time of their ordination. The Council of Nice thought that the ancient tradition of the church should be reestablished in conformity with the 26th apostolical canon, which permitted marriage only to those who held the office of readers or chanters in the churches.

The principal Papal decrees which have been issued by the popes on the subject of sacerdotal celibacy are the following: It is said that Calixtus I.; who was elected in 221, renewed a constitution forbidding the marriage of priests. It is said, too, that Lucius I., elected in 255, reenacted the same prohibition. We do not, however, reach any certainty on the subject till we come to the Council of Elvira, the first of those on matters of discipline the decrees of which are extant. It is doubtful whether this council was held in the year 300 or 313. The thirty-third and thirty-sixth canons of this council command bishops, priests, deacons, and subdeacons to live apart from their wives. The council further prohibited ecclesiastics from having any female in their houses save a sister or a daughter, and those only when virgins, who had consecrated their virginity to God. The ecclesiastical writers maintain that these constitutions were but the confirmation by authoritative sanction of the practice which had been immemorially observed, rather as an apostolic tradition than a positive command. From that time to the time of Gregory VII. (the great Hildebrand, elected 1073), a series of popes issued decrees commanding bishops, priests, and deacons to observe celibacy. But all of them are couched in terms, and put forth under circumstances, which indicate that the regulation was by no means universally, perhaps even it may be said generally, observed. Gregory VII., in the council held at Rome in the year 1074, determined more decisively and vigorously that, according to the sacred canons and the decrees of his predecessors, no ecclesiastic could be a married man, that the sacrament of ordination should be conferred on none except those who professed perpetual celibacy, and that no wived priest should celebrate or even assist at the Mass.

Upon the whole it is clear that the pretension advanced by the Church of Rome to insist on the celibacy of its clergy was at first put forward tentatively and gradually, as a thing desirable and tending to higher perfection, rather than as a thing absolutely necessary; that, like so much else in that church, it was an encroachment on Christian liberty, originating in a mystic idea of the greater purity of a state of celibacy, which was a natural product of the working of the human intellect in the earliest centuries of Christianity, and became fixed and consolidated into a rigid law, as the rulers of the church, and especially Gregory VII., came to perceive that it was a potent engine of ecclesiastical power. It is probable that Hildebrand, the nature of whose intellect and temper was such as eminently to qualify him for perceiving, appreciating at its true value, and utilizing the doctrine of the universal celibacy of the clergy, was the first ruler of the church who clearly saw the incalculably enormous power which this rule placed in the hands of the hierarchy as a body, yet more notably that it tended to increase that of each individual priest. To this and to this alone it has been and is due that a Catholic priest is the citizen of no country, and acknowledges or at least feels no allegiance, unless perhaps a subordinate and secondary one, save to his church, and that to him his order is in the place of family and country; and the greatness, the power, the glory, and the supremacy of the church constitutes that for which the best minds among the priesthood labor and live. But while churchmen were becoming more and more alive to the vast importance of celibacy as a sine qua non of the priesthood, minds which were fitted to estimate that institution with a larger view to its ultimate results and consequences became at an early period aware of its veritable consequences. Erasmus, in his 19th Epistle (lib. 29), gives us at once his own and Augustine’s views of the subject in the following remarkable passage:– ‘Mirum vero si procus amans laudat nuptias, dicitque castum conjugium non multum abesse a laude virginitatis, quum Augustious patriarcharum polygamiam anteponat nostro cælibatui’....” [End]


If one has followed this presentation very carefully, one will comprehend that we have covered a multitude of subjects – too many to do every one their due justice. First and foremost, there is absolutely no way a man or a woman can draw closer to the Almighty Yahweh by practicing celibacy or virginity! Had Augustine lived a thousand years, he could not have drawn himself one nano-inch (i.e., one billionth of an inch) closer to his Maker by repudiating every White woman on the face of the earth during his time! There is Scripture that disclaims this false doctrine, at John 6:44-45, thusly:

44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day. 45 It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of Yahweh. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me.” Notice: It is Yahweh that does the “drawing”, not Adam-man, thus no celibacy or virginity is required, regardless of station in life!

I would also point out that William Guy Carr took 1 Thessalonians 4:1-7 completely out-of-context where it states:

1 Furthermore then we beseech you, brethren, and exhort you by the Master Yahshua, that as ye have received of us how ye ought to walk and to please Yahweh, so ye would abound more and more. 2 For ye know what commandments we gave you by the Master Yahshua. 3 For this is the will of Yahweh, even your sanctification, that ye should abstain from fornication: 4 That every one of you should know how to possess his vessel in sanctification and honour; 5 Not in the lust of concupiscence, even as the ethnosG1484(i.e., race / nation or people group) which know not Yahweh: 6 That no man go beyond and defraud his brother in any matter: because that Yahweh is the avenger of all such, as we also have forewarned you and testified. 7 For Yahweh hath not called us unto uncleanness, but unto holiness.”

Evidently people like William Guy Carr, and his Roman Catholic church, believe that all sex is evil, and quote this passage to support their false premise and conclusion! However, with the Greek word “fornication”, this passage is addressing the specific sin of race-mixing rather than “sex” in general! As a matter of fact, intercourse properly engaged in is considered to be righteous in the sight of Yahweh, who created it! For evidence, see 1 John 3:9:

Whosoever is born of Yahweh doth not commit sin; for his seedG4690(i.e., sperm) remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of Yahweh.”

Actually, the roman catholic might claim that this passage supports the church’s position on celibacy, but rather it implies it is impossible for one to sin as long as one’s sperm remains in him, for when a White Adamite man marries a White Adamite woman, the two become as one, and when conception occurs, the White Adamite man’s sperm remains within this couple who have become one! William Finck, in his Christogenea New Testament renders this verse thusly:

Each who has been born from of Yahweh does not create wrongdoing, because His seed abides in him, and he is not able to do wrong, because from of Yahweh he has been born.” Therefore, had Augustine kept his wife and continued to have sex with her, it would have been absolutely impossible for him to commit sin by doing so! See Gen. 2:22-24:

22 And the rib, which Yahweh Elohim had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. 23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. 24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.” How dare any church denomination teach any other doctrine! After all, Adam was the first Melchizedek priest, whom Christ Himself later would become! Actually the “original sin” was committed when one third of the angels were cast out of heaven at Rev. 12:7-9, and then mixed with every kind. Eventually, Eve was deceived by the serpent, and bare Cain.

The World Book Encyclopedia, vol. 13, page 327, under “Menstruation” states:

Premenstrual Phase. The egg released by the ovary makes its way slowly down the Fallopian tube to the uterus. The journey takes about five days. If sperm are present, fertilization takes place in the Fallopian tube. This egg-sperm combination then settles into the lining of the uterus, which has become thick and spongy with many blood vessels and watery fluids. ... When this happens the menstrual cycle usually stops until after the baby is born.” This is exactly the way Yahweh created Adam and Eve to be reproductive from their beginning. Since that beginning, Adam-man carries 23 male chromosomes in his sperm bank, and the Adamic-woman carries 23 female chromosomes in her oocyte-bank in her two ovaries, making a total of 46 chromosomes to bring forth a fully formed healthy child. Each ovary contains as many as 400,000 potential oocyte eggs. In other words, a woman is a potential city of 800,000 people! It is only when these two sets of 23 chromosomes merge that consummation takes place. A perfect conception only happens when each male and female’s chromosomes match #1 to #1; #2 to #2; on down to #23 to #23.

However, if there is no “desire” for conception to take place, all of this is for naught. Hence, Yahweh created “desire” as a device to cause both the male and female to conceive! Few know, but in 1972 Johns Hopkins University discovered dopamine receptors in the brain. “The scientists reasoned there must be some other function for these receptors sites. They soon figured out that the active ingredient in all these opiates – morphine – had a chemical structure similar to endorphins, a class of chemicals present in the brain. Endorphins are feelgood chemicals naturally-manufactured in the brain when the body experiences pain or stress. They are called the natural opiates of the body ... Endorphins flood the space between nerve cells and usually inhibit neurons from firing, thus creating an analgesic effect. On a lower level they can excite neurons as well. When endorphins do their work, the organism feels good, high, or euphoric, and feels relief from pain ...”

The bottom line truth is: there is absolutely nothing sinful concerning sexual intercourse, as long as we obey the Biblical injunctions concerning its use, such as refusing to mix one’s race with an alien nonwhite!