Ted R. Weiland Denounces Yahshua Christ

Let’s See How He Does It

Though this is not the exact phraseology which Ted R. Weiland used in his July 14, 2005 letter to Tony Gonyer, this was the sum and substance of his pronouncement. One can be quite sure, had Ted R. Weiland been as skilled in the Word of Yahweh as he pretends he is, he would never have made such a ridiculous statement! Weiland’s words to Tony were: “I’m a racialist, not a racist. By racism, I am referring to white-supremacists and those who hate the other races simply because they are not white. Is that what you are? If that is what you are, I’m sorry, I denounce it.” One might describe it as unwittingly or unknowingly, but the results of Weiland’s words remain the same, for one must first comprehend that Christ Himself is a racist. Therefore, in denouncing racists, Weiland was denouncing Yahshua-Christ Himself as He also is a RACIST. Proofs of this are unquestionable being in Christ’s own Words and always spoken in hidden “parables.” Thus, in not knowing the true meanings of Christ’s Words and being unskilled in them, Ted R. Weiland denounces our Redeemer and takes upon himself an antichrist position.

LET’S AGAIN EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE 

Ted R. Weiland has the symptoms of one very grievously afflicted with a debilitating disease best described as “God-syndrome.” One of the signs is a very pronounced feeling of egocentricity, causing the victim to hallucinate that the entire world revolves around him/her, that he/she only has the correct answers (in spite of substantial evidence otherwise) to all things, and is thus infallible.

THE SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OTHERWISE 

For this we’ll go to Matthew 13:47-50 which reads: “47 Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of every kind: 48 Which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good into vessels, but cast the bad away. 49 So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, 50 And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.”

It should be noted that the word “kind” is from the Greek “genos” (γένος) which W. E. Vine in his An Expository Dictionary Of New Testament Words defined as, “a family ... stock ... offspring ... kindred ... race ... nation.”  (#1085 in Strongs.) Under “Kind” Vine states for the most part:

“KIND (Noun) 1. genos (1085), akin to ginomai, ‘to become,’ denotes (a) ‘a family,’ Acts 4:6, ‘kindred;’ 7:13, rv, ‘race’ (kjv, ‘kindred’); 13:26, ‘stock’; (b) ‘an offspring,’ Acts 17:28; Rev. 22:16; (c) ‘a nation, a race,’ Mark 7:26, rv, ‘race’ (kjv, ‘nation’); Acts 4:36, rv ‘(a man of Cyprus) by race,’ kjv, ‘of the country (of Cyprus);’ genos does not mean ‘a country;’ the word here signifies ‘parentage’; ...  ‘race’ (kjv, ‘kindred’); 18:2, 24, rv, ‘by race’ (kjv, ‘born’); 2 Cor. 11:26, ‘countrymen’; Gal. 1:14, rv, ‘countrymen’ (kjv, ‘nation’); Phil. 3:5, ‘stock’; 1 Pet. 2:9, rv, ‘race’ (kjv, ‘generation’); (d) ‘a kind, sort, class,’ Matt. 13:47, ‘kind’; in some mss. in 17:21, kjv, ‘kind;’ Mark 9:29, ‘kind’ ...”

Once we are aware that the English word “kind”, translated from the Greek, means “race” it clears up the verse’s context. The whole verse is based upon the subject of race, and what’s going to happen to them at the end of the world as we know it. The following rendition does absolutely no violence to the context:

“47 Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea [of people], and gathered of every race: 48 Which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good [racial kind] into vessels, but cast the bad [racial kind] away. 49 So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, 50 And shall cast them [the bad racial kind] into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.”

Therefore, there are a good [racial kind] and those considered bad [racial kinds]. Moreover the “bad” racial kinds are considered “wicked” and the “good” racial kind are considered “just”, and it has nothing to do with someone accepting Christ or not, and has everything to do with one’s “race”, and Yahweh never created any bad [racial kind], ever! Bad racial kinds come about through bastardization! Anyone reading and interpreting this passage in any other context is running a pretzel factory! And anyone who thinks they can convert the bad [racial kinds] so they can enter the Kingdom are deceiving themselves big time! And all those who are quoting Acts 3:21 out of context, which concerns the “restitution of all things”, and in a universal sense, thinking that the bad racial kind can enter the Kingdom are simply insane. What can they be “restored” to but what they already are? Matthew 13:47-50 implies no such thing, but quite the opposite! Many of the now living bad racial kinds are doing so as instruments of punishment to get Israel back in line.

All one need do is go to the creation story of Genesis, and it is repeated time and again, “Everything after its kind, and it was good.” But here we find ourselves face to face with some bad racial kinds to be cast away and some good racial kind to be kept! Don’t get mad at me, for these are not my words but they are in red letters in my Bible, or the very words of Yahshua Christ Himself who was no other than Yahweh-God in the flesh! Therefore, the only conclusion we can arrive at is the fact that Yahshua Christ Himself is a RACIST.

How in the world does anyone get “restitution of all things” out of that? Here it appears that the “restitution of all things” are for the good [racial kind], for they are not “cast away.” When do we start restoring something by casting it away? Yet certainly I can see how things could be restored by casting the bad away if the bad were not in Yahweh’s original plan. Now that’s the kind of restoration I would like to see!

This parable, the seventh, last of the series, directs our thoughts to the completion of the kingdom as seven is a number of completion.  These words then are fitting: “So shall it be in the end of the world;” and this gives us a starting point for its interpretation. We must then consider what part the kingdom of heaven is to play after other kingdoms have played their parts and vanished from the scene; when things are being settled for the final makeup of the Kingdom according to their value before Yahshua and His Kingship. Surely this final separation of “kinds” must happen before His coronation and He is the crowned King.

We must comprehend to whom the parable is directed and its practical application and the progression through which the final objective will be achieved. Our Master would have us consider the consummation of all things: when the great net shall at last be drawn to shore, when there shall be no more sea [of people], no ebb and flow [to and fro movement], and especially no more mingling of good with the bad. In a new of environment and a deliberate sitting down to see what has been made of this world by this satanic conglomeration, and a tallying up on that eternal shore of all the results for the better. In short, there will no longer be any more integration problems! From then on, only White children will be found on the playgrounds, no thanks to Ted R. Weiland! (And what beautiful children they will be.)

TED R. WEILAND’S LETTER TO YAHSHUA 

Since Weiland has so thoroughly stated his position in his letters to Tony Gonyer of July 14 and August 5, 2005, we can ascertain what kind of letter he might write Yahshua Christ. It might possibly go something like this:

“Dear Yahshua-Christ,       Anytime U.S.A.

“I am not a racist, but I prefer to be called a racialist. When I speak of racism, I am referring to white-supremacists and those who hate the other races because they are not white. Is that what you are Yahshua? If that is what you are Yahshua, I’m sorry Yahshua, I denounce it, and have no alternative but to denounce You also! T.R.W.”

How in the world does Ted R. Weiland get around James 4:4? This verse says: “Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with Yahweh? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of Yahweh.”

Inasmuch as Ted R. Weiland wants to be friends to the other races, He unwittingly makes himself an enemy of Yahweh whom he claims to love. And notice that this kind of friendship is called “adultery” by James. 1 John 2:15 takes this thought one step further by saying: “Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.”

To show unmerited affection to the other races suggests strongly that the love of Yahweh is sadly lacking. Why love the “wicked” races while neglecting the “just” race of Matt. 13:49? Such a position shows only contempt for our own race and Yahshua, who has chosen to be our kin! When one contributes to the needs of a child of the “wicked” races, one automatically steals from the needs of a child of the “just” race.

Remember, we were commanded to help the widows and orphans of our own race. Therefore make sure the many needs of our own race are satisfied, and there will always be a needy member of the “just” race somewhere. To give aid to the “wicked” races is to elevate them to rule over us, and then tread us underfoot, which they are already doing! 1 Tim 5:8 says: “But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.”

Thus, by this Biblical criteria, Ted R. Weiland has made himself an “infidel” by sending Bibles to Nigeria. Oh, excuse me, for I notice here it says “worse than an infidel.” Question: How can anyone call himself a “Christian” when he has “denied the faith.” What is there about the words “his own” and “own house” that Weiland doesn’t understand?!?!

KINGDOM IS A CLOSED CORPORATION 

Whether Ted R. Weiland likes it or not, Yahweh’s Kingdom is a closed corporation, and once a new Israelite child is born, that child becomes a stockholder. No one else can buy into this Kingdom, for it is not for sale at any price. If a half-breed is born to a stockholder, the child cannot inherit or benefit in any way. This closed corporation has twelve gates of entrance with the name of one of the twelve Patriarchs written thereon, and every true-born stockholder must pass through the gate of the patriarch on their father’s side.

Question: Which of these twelve gates are Ted R. Weiland’s Nigerians going through in order to enter the Kingdom? And remember, there is no thirteenth gate as Ephraim and Manasseh both enter through Joseph’s gate. It is evident that we have a whole bunch of charlatans out there in “Israel Identity” proclaiming all kinds of untruths which cannot, in any way, be backed up by Scripture, and Ted R. Weiland’s actions and statements pertaining to Nigerians are among those prevarications! Rather than conforming to Yahweh’s criteria, Ted R. Weiland demands everyone follow Ted R. Weiland’s criteria. As I mentioned in a previous brochure, Ted R. Weiland is suffering from a severe case of “God-syndrome.” This “God-syndrome” is evident on one of Weiland’s recent audio CDs where he makes the statement: “You might be a Christian if ...” In other words, “You might be a Christian if you follow Ted R. Weiland’s criteria for being so.” That, of course, is Weiland’s criteria, and would include Nigerians to whom he sent Bibles. What other reason would Weiland have for sending the Bibles to Nigeria?

There is no “might be” in being a Christian. If one is born a pure Israelite, one is born a Christian by genetics. It’s that simple. Yahweh married Israel, and when Israel was unfaithful to Him, Yahweh gave Israel an edict of divorce. Under Yahweh’s laws, once a divorce is given, neither party can remarry except for one provision, and that is if one of the parties die. Therefore, Yahweh decided to come in the flesh and die by giving His blood on the cross so He might meet the requirements of the law, and then be free to remarry Israel once more. That was the ordinance that was “nailed to the cross.” The conclusion is: Christ died for every Israelite, so every Israelite is a Christian under covenant law and were called “the anointed” in the Old Testament, which is the proper definition of a Christian and the term “Christ.” Therefore, only an Israelite can be a Christian, Weiland or no Weiland.

And there is no possible way to make a Nigerian a Christian, whether they be baptized 10 thousand times or given 50 thousand Bibles each. And, again, it’s all racial! The Israelites have no other choice but to be Christian and the non-Israelites have no other choice but to be non-Christian! Surely, Weiland wouldn’t be so inept as to believe that Yahshua-Christ would marry the other races, going contrary to His Own Law! But this is what Ted R. Weiland is advocating by sending Bibles to Nigeria. Ted R. Weiland should be ashamed for even suggesting such a thing, but Weiland proclaims such a message loud and clear by sending Bibles to the Nigerians. If Ted R. Weiland really believes this, he should marry a Nigerian.

Does that sound outrageous? But this is what Weiland would have Christ do! The fact is: Yahweh married and divorced Israel, and by law could only remarry them by dying. To marry others under any circumstance, therefore, would then be adultery; breaking His own commandment! Such a relationship, which Weiland suggests, would reduce our Kinsman Redeemer to the status of a common whore!

In conclusion, we’ll close this paper as we started it. “Ted R. Weiland Denounces Yahshua Christ.” They’re his words, and only he can seek Yahshua for His forgiveness. Final question: How can fishes be considered “just” or “wicked”?

Clifton A. Emahiser’s Teaching Ministries