The Pitfalls Found In Biblical Commentaries, Lexicons & Dictionaries

 Title page of Alcazar's Revelation thesisThe Pitfalls Found In Biblical Commentaries, Lexicons & Dictionaries, by Clifton Emahiser

While some of these Biblical helps are better than others, even the best have some serious errors! For instance some Bible cross-references can lead one astray, so let’s consider some of the better center-references found in a few Bibles:

If you have a King James Version Bible with the proper center reference, you can very readily prove Two Seedline teaching with it, for it will take you from one supporting verse of Scripture to another almost endlessly on the subject. (Not that the King James Version is an especially advisable Bible to use for study, as it is alleged to contain approximately 27,000 translation mistakes.)

The King James Version center reference system I am referring to was produced by the opinions of many contributing scholars and theologians. Most of the older Bibles have this proper center reference system. I have a King James Version published by The World Publishing Company during the mid 50’s which has the proper center reference system. I checked a World Bible recently at a Christian bookstore, and it had been corrupted from the former one I have. I also have a large Southwestern Bible which has the desirable center reference system. I understand some of the Bibles printed by Dove Inc., Nashville, TN, have this preferred center reference also. Twenty years ago, one could purchase a King James Version Zondervan Classic Reference Bible with this more satisfactory center-reference system.

Who are the Biblical Angels? – A Critical Perspective, (#12)

In paper #10 of this series, I demonstrated how the fallen angels of Gen. 6:1-4 had sexual relations with the daughters of Adam-man, producing giants [i.e., Nephilim, meaning “fallen ones”]. In 1936, there was a giant born to Edomite-jewish parents in Tel Aviv who later immigrated to New York, and the news of this was a sensation in the late 1930s and early 40s in the United States. At that time many believed gigantism was due to a thyroid malfunction. However, it is a genetic condition caused by hybridization.

Who are the Biblical Angels? – A Critical Perspective, (# 9)

This will be the 9th paper in this series and we will dwell on the subject of the presence of Yahweh’s manifestations and attributes among His people, Israel. The greater part of churchianity are under the delusion that Almighty Yahweh is a “trinity” of three different “persons”. Rather, Yahweh is One Almighty in several manifestations! It is true that Yahweh includes Father, Son and Holy Spirit as three of His manifestations, but there are many more manifestations and attributes than just these three. Isaiah 7:14 & 9:6 state:

Who are the Biblical Angels? – A Critical Perspective, (# 7)

This will be the 7th paper in this series and we will dwell on the subject of “Satan”, as the term is greatly misunderstood, many believing there is no such being known as “Satan”. To start this thesis, I will quote from an unlikely, but in this case, an unbiased source, the 1980 Collier’s Encyclopedia, vol. 8, p. 166, under the general title “Devil”:

Who are the Biblical Angels? – A Critical Perspective, (# 5)

If one does not have papers #’s 1, 2, 3 & 4 of this series, it is paramount that these papers in this study be obtained and reviewed in order to comprehend where we are, at the present time!

As I was nearing the end paper #3, I was discussing the possibility of the fallen angels using aphrodisiac plant-based stimuli to jump-start their sexual desires, and I stated the following, (which I have upgraded):