One-Page Handouts

To hit the road running let’s read the two verses cited:

Rev. 2:9: “I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews [sic of Judah], and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.”

Isa. 56:10-11: “¹⁰ His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber.

Josephus’ Antiquities 13:9:1 states in part: “...

We read at Genesis 26:34-35:“³⁴ And Esau was forty years old when he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite: ³⁵ Which were a grief of mind unto Isaac and to Rebekah.”

We are about to address the Bible’s most serious offense. Everywhere in the Old Testament the Hebrew word for “seed”, “sperm” or “descendant” (i.e., “offspring”) is Strong’s #2233 “zera”, except Lev. 19:19 and Deut. 22:9, where the Strong’s #3610 is used for “seeds”, “diverse kind”, “mingled seed” and “mingled”; (once for “seeds” at Deut. 22:9, and three times as “diverse kind”, “mingled seed” and “mingled” at Lev. 19:19) in the KJV.

There are many who, when they attend a church func- tion or other stage-play featuring the manger scene, with the three wise men, along with their visit to consult Herod to determine the location of the then recently born Christ Child, fail to fully comprehend all of the events taking place in the surrounding history which are seldom revealed. This will be an effort to divulge some of the missing data.

When researching Biblical chronology, it would be well to start with the book of Revelation, chapter 12, as it speaks of an event which happened long before the creation of Adam, and the consequences are still with us today. The four entities mentioned above are brought together into one collective category at Revelation 12:9 which states:

This is a very serious Biblical story seldom, if ever, addressed anywhere in the various sects of churchianity! I attended church for about 35 years, and I never heard this subject mentioned one single time, so I doubt very much whether any of my readers have heard it either. For evi- dence on this matter, I will cite Eusebius’ The History of the Church, translated by G.A. Williamson, published by Pen- guin Books. pp.

Both the Old and New Testaments, plus most of the Apocrypha, highly condemn the unforgivable sin of race- mixing (i.e., miscegenation). “Kind after kind” is repeated numerously in Genesis chapter 1; v.12, “... herb yielding seed after his kind ... tree yielding fruit, whose seed ... after his kind”, v. 21, “... created great whales ... creatures that moveth ... after their kind ... every winged fowl after his kind ...”, v. 24 “beast of the earth after his kind”, v. 25 “... beast after his kind ...

“An Associated Press Release from Victoria Falls, Rhodesia, dated February 18, 1960, reads in part as follows:

“... However, [Billy] Graham declared, ‘I don’t see how the South African approach (of rigid segregation) can possibly work’ ... ‘Christ was not a European,’ he said, ‘He wasn’t fair skinned. I should say He was swarthy ...’.”[Destiny, June 1962]