One-Page Handouts

Understanding the Satanic-Edomite-Jews of Revelation 2:9 & 3:9!

To hit the road running let’s read the two verses cited:

Rev. 2:9: “I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews [sic of Judah], and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.”

Rev. 3:9: “Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews [sic of Judah], and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.” (cf. John 8:44)

Before we start to take some of this text out-of-context, there is one phrase in 3:9 where some readers come to a mistaken conclusion, and that is: “... I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.”

Right away, some people will conclude that somehow these evil Edomite-Satanic-jews are going to repent, and turn and wor- ship Christ. Nothing could be further from the truth!

Three Notable Biblical Women Misrepresented by the Clergy!

Isa. 56:10-11:10 His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber. 11 ...greedy dogs which can never have enough ...shepherds that cannot understand: they all look to their own way, every one for his gain ....”

Nearly all of today’s inept clergy will insist that Ruth was a racial Moabite, and that the Almighty made an exception in her case. Geographic History will prove otherwise!To understand that Ruth was an Israelite instead of a Moabite, we must know some of the history which led up to Ruth’s time.

Amorites absorb Moabites:The most important thing we must understand is the fact that the Amorites had conquered and absorbed the Moabites. The Moabites descended from Lot’s incest with one of his two daughters, named Moab. By the time of the incident at Baalpeor, the Moabites were no longer a racially pure people. We can be quite sure of this as Paul called Israel’s sexual encounter with the Moabite women ‘fornication’ i.e., race-mixing (1 Cor. 10:8). What we can be certain of is, shortly before the Israelites arrived in the Transjordan, Sihon, a king of the Amorites, had defeated the previous king of Moab (Num. 21:26) and absorbed much of the Moabite territory as far south as the Arnon(The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, vol. K-Q, p. 414). For verification of this fact, Num. 21:26 reads:

For Heshbon was the city of Sihon the king of the Amor- ites, who had fought against the former king of Moab, and taken all his land out of his hand, even unto Arnon.”

What the serious Bible scholar must understand is that during the Joshua period, the Israelites destroyed the Amorites, who had absorbed the Moabites, killing and/or displacing both of them. Upon driving the Amorites (+ absorbed Moabites) out of the promised land, it is recorded at Joshua 18:7 that half of the tribe of Manasseh, along with the tribes of Gad and Reuben, moved into the former land of Moab east of the Jordan. It was later, during the Judges period, that an Israelite lady from the conquered land of Moab by the name of Ruth journeyed with her mother-in-law Naomi from the land of Moab back to Bethlehem. Yes, Ruth was an Israelite, and surely NOT a Moabite!

The Process By Which Edomites & Canaanites Became Judahites!

Josephus’ Antiquities 13:9:1 states in part: “... Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea, and subdued all the Idumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of the laws of the Jews [sic Jdaeans]; and they were so desirous of living in the country of their [Edomite] forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and the rest of the Jewish [sic Judahite] ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, that they were hereafter no other than [Edomite] Jews.

Heinrich Graetz in his History Of The Jews, vol. 2 of 6, p. 7 was well aware of this Edomite conversion to Judaism, stating:

John Hyrcanus, who until then had acted only in self- defense, was now, after the fall of Alexander Zabina (123 [B.C.]), ready to strike energetically at Syria. Judæa at that time was encompassed on three sides by foreign tribes: on the south by the Idumæans, on the north by the hated Samaritans, and beyond the Jordan by the Greeks, who had never been friendly to the Judæ- ans. Hyrcanus therefore considered it his mission to reconquer all those lands, and either to expel their inhabitants or to incorporate them with the Judæans: for so long as foreign and hostile tribes existed in the very heart of the country, its political independence and religious stability would be in constant danger. Not only were these hostile peoples ever ready to join surrounding nations and assist them in their greed for conquest, but they also often inter- fered with the religious worship of the Judæans, thus frequently giving rise to acts of violence and bloodshed. Hyrcanus was con- sequently impelled by religious as well as by political motives to tear up these hotbeds of constant disturbance and hostility.”[Here, Graetz is admitting the Edomite incorporation!]

The Herodian Dynasty, a Tribe of Satanic-Devils Sired by Esau!

We read at Genesis 26:34-35:34 And Esau was forty years old when he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite: 35 Which were a grief of mind unto Isaac and to Rebekah.”

Not only “a grief of mind unto Isaac and Rebekah”, but a “grief of mind” unto Yahweh Almighty Himself. And for good rea- son, for at Malachi 1:2-3 it assuredly states:2 I have loved you, saith Yahweh. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob’s brother? saith Yahweh: yet I loved Jacob, 3 And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness.”

It is essential to recognize that Esau’s two Hittite wives were descended from the ten cursed Canaanite nations of, Gen. 15:19-21, especially the Kenites, who are traceable to Cain who murdered Abel, and the Rephaim, who were descended from giants. Thus, not only did Yahweh hate Esau, but it is also stated of Edom at Psalm 137:9:“Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.”(cf. v. 7.)

Diverse Seeds Defile Families Downline Forever & Is Incurable!

We are about to address the Bible’s most serious offense. Everywhere in the Old Testament the Hebrew word for “seed”, “sperm” or “descendant” (i.e., “offspring”) is Strong’s #2233 “zera”, except Lev. 19:19 and Deut. 22:9, where the Strong’s #3610 is used for “seeds”, “diverse kind”, “mingled seed” and “mingled”; (once for “seeds” at Deut. 22:9, and three times as “diverse kind”, “mingled seed” and “mingled” at Lev. 19:19) in the KJV. These two passages, with their four occurrences, are an exception to the rule concerning “seeds” rather than “seed”.

Quoting these verses from e-Sword, with words for Strong’s #3610 underlined along with each of the four KJV renderings:

Deut. 22:9: “Thou shalt not3808 sow2232 thy vineyard3754 with divers seeds3610: lest6435 the fruit4395 of thy seed2233 which834 thou hast sown,2232 and the fruit8393 of thy vine- yard3754, be defiled6942.” [This would apply to man as well.]

Lev. 19:19: “Ye shall keep8104+853 my statutes2708. Thou shalt not3808 let thy cattle929 gender7250 with a diverse kind3610: thou shalt not3808 sow2232 thy field7704 with mingled seed3610: neither3808 shall a garment899 mingled3610 of linen and wool- en8162 come5927 upon5921 thee.” [This would apply to man as well.]

#H3610 is rendered “divers seeds”, “diverse kind”, “mingled seed”, and “mingled”. #H3610 is an interesting Hebrew word used to denote such “seed”! It is derived from the dual form of #H3608 which means “a prison”. It would appear that what we have here are two individual seeds with dissimilar genetics, imprisoned or locked into one capsule from which neither can escape. In other words, “two, of a twofold kind” imprisoned in a single person, animal or plant.

Some Little-Known Biblical Facts Concerning Christmas!

There are many who, when they attend a church func- tion or other stage-play featuring the manger scene, with the three wise men, along with their visit to consult Herod to determine the location of the then recently born Christ Child, fail to fully comprehend all of the events taking place in the surrounding history which are seldom revealed. This will be an effort to divulge some of the missing data.

First of all, the Herod family were Edomites who were converted to Judaism about 105 B.C., which we find record- ed at Josephus’ Antiq. bk. 13: ch, 9: par. 1, in part:

... Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea, and subdued all the Idumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of the laws of the Jews; and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and the rest of the Jewish ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, that they were hereafter no other than Jews ....”[Note: These “jews” were NOT Judah!]

The Mystery of the Great Dragon, Serpent, Devil & Satan!

When researching Biblical chronology, it would be well to start with the book of Revelation, chapter 12, as it speaks of an event which happened long before the creation of Adam, and the consequences are still with us today. The four entities mentioned above are brought together into one collective category at Revelation 12:9 which states:

And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angelsG32 were cast out with him.” It’s imperative to grasp that the designations “dragon”, “serpent, and “Devil” are simply substitute labels for “Satan”!

It should immediately become evident that John, in his Revelation, grouped these four allegorical symbols as having a common agenda. Notice especially the words, “... he was cast out into the earth, and his angelsG32 were cast out with him.” Firstly, this implies an angel leader, and secondly, a group of angel followers. Jude 1:6 explains this in greater detail thusly:

And the angelsG32 which kept not their first estateG746, but left their own habitationG3613, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.”

How Edom Infiltrated & Overthrew Judaea in the 1st Century B.C.!

This is a very serious Biblical story seldom, if ever, addressed anywhere in the various sects of churchianity! I attended church for about 35 years, and I never heard this subject mentioned one single time, so I doubt very much whether any of my readers have heard it either. For evi- dence on this matter, I will cite Eusebius’ The History of the Church, translated by G.A. Williamson, published by Pen- guin Books. pp. 18-19, (and this passage will demand editing to properly comprehend the context):

Extinction of the native Jewish [sic Judahite] dynasty: Herod, the first foreign [Edomite] king: 6. At this time Herod became the first foreigner to be king of the Jewish [sic Judaean] nation, fulfilling the words of Moses:

“‘There shall not be wanting a ruler from Judah • Nor a leader sprung from his loins • Until he come for whom it is reserved.’

Moses adds that he will be the expectation of the Gentiles [sic ethnos, nations]. There could be no fulfilment of the pre- diction as long as they were free to live under rulers of their own [Israelite] race, beginning with Moses himself and continuing to Augustus’ reign; in his time the first foreigner, Herod, was entrusted by the Romans with the government of the Jews [sic Judahites]. Josephus informs us that he was an Idumaean on his father’s side and an Arab on his mother’s; but according to Afri- canus – and he was no ordinary historian – the best authorities say that Antipater, Herod’s father, was son of a certain Herod of Ascalon, one of the ‘temple-slaves’ of Apollo. This Antipater was taken prisoner by Idumaean bandits when a medium child, and re- mained in their hands because his father was too poor to put down his ransom. He was brought up in their ways and later befriended by Hyrcanus, the Jewish [sic Levitical Israelite] high priest. His son was the Herod of our Saviour’s time.

Holy Writ Mandates Racial Segregation for White-Adam-Man!

Both the Old and New Testaments, plus most of the Apocrypha, highly condemn the unforgivable sin of race- mixing (i.e., miscegenation). “Kind after kind” is repeated numerously in Genesis chapter 1; v.12, “... herb yielding seed after his kind ... tree yielding fruit, whose seed ... after his kind”, v. 21, “... created great whales ... creatures that moveth ... after their kind ... every winged fowl after his kind ...”, v. 24 “beast of the earth after his kind”, v. 25 “... beast after his kind ... cattle after his kind ... that creepeth ... after his kind ...”, v. 26 “... man in our image, after our likeness ...”

The “man”at Gen. 1:26 is Strong’s #120 (the verb form #119 meaning “to show blood (in the face (i.e. flush or turn rosy ...)), from which is the proper noun “Adam”H121 at Gen. 2:19. This ability of “Adam”, the “man” who can blush sets the Adamic man separately far apart and above all the other nonwhite and racially mixed-peoples! Also, the name “Adam”H121means “ruddy”, and “blood” (i.e., “dam”) is in his name, Strong’s #1818. Therefore, the nonwhite and mixed races have no Biblically lawful standing!

Billy Graham Claimed Christ was Swarthy rather than Ruddy!

An Associated Press Release from Victoria Falls, Rhodesia, dated February 18, 1960, reads in part as follows:

... However, [Billy] Graham declared, ‘I don’t see how the South African approach (of rigid segregation) can possibly work’ ... ‘Christ was not a European,’ he said, ‘He wasn’t fair skinned. I should say He was swarthy ...’.”[Destiny, June 1962]

It is quite surprising, to say the least, to find Graham teach- ing that Christ ‘wasn’t [FAIR] skinned – but [SWARTHY]’!

In The American Heritage Dictionary with Indo-European Roots, the word “fair” as an adjective means: “1. Visually beauti- ful or admirable; lovely: a fair maiden2. Of light color, as a. Blond: fair hair ....” Webster’s New World Dictionary has on the adjective “fair”: “1. attractive; beautiful; lovely. 2. unblemished; clean ... 3, [< notion that dark coloring was foul] light in color; blond [fair hair] ....” Webster’s definition for “swarthy” is: “... having a dark complexion; dusky ...”. One of the meanings of “dusky” is “lacking light; dim; shadowy” somewhere between intense light and deep darkness, which would be “arab” in the Hebrew at Strong’s #6150, where it means, “... to grow dusky at sundown ...” & #6154 where it means, “... a mixture, (or mongrel race) ....” Thus, we have four words to pursue here; “fair”, “ruddy”, “swarthy” & “arab”.

The Greatest Identity Theft In The History Of The World

Exhibit #1: The Complete Works of Flavius Josephus, Antiquities, Book 13, Chapter 9, Paragraph 1 in part, plus note at the bottom of the page as scanned from my copy of Whiston’s book, printed by Kregel Publishing:

... Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea, and subdued all the Idumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of the laws of the Jews; and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision,* and the rest of the Jewish ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, that they were hereafter no other than Jews.

It’s Insane to Claim a 3rd Temple at Jerusalem Will Be Built!

Not only is it the height of insanity to promote this supposition, but it borders on blasphemy! Many mediocre Bible students are aware of the original Temple built by Solomon and the 2nd more humble Temple rebuilt by Zerubbabel after the seventy years of Judah’s captivity in Babylon. But they are entirely oblivious to the Temple which Herod built after tearing down Zerubbabel’s Temple to, and including, its foundations (Josephus’ Antiq. 15:11:3).

Testimony is found at The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, vol. R-Z, p.p. 550-551, under subtitle “Temple, Jerusalem”:

THE TEMPLE OF HEROD:As was pointed out above, this temple lasted a much shorter time than the other two. Begun ca. 20 B.C.,the basic structure was completed in about a year and a half, but subsidiary construction was still in process a half-century later (John 2:20),and may not have been entirely finished when the destruction came in A.D. 70. Although on the same site as the two preceding temples, this one involved an almost complete rebuilding according to the new and then prevailing style of architecture, the Hellenistic-Roman, but with retention of the Solomonic arrangement of rooms within the sanctuary itself. It is logically absurd, therefore, to confuse Herod’s and Zerubbabel’s temples under the name of ‘second temple.’ Herod’s was definitely the third temple, no matter what tradition may say.[Note: Herod’s temple was satanically inspired. C.A.E]

Pages