FOR THOSE TO WHOM THE COVENANT BELONGS

Welcome to Clifton A. Emahiser’s Non-Universal Teaching Ministries. Here there shall be posted archives of all of the writings produced by this ministry since its inception in February of 1998. This site is the official site for Clifton Emahiser's Watchman's Teaching Ministries. Thank you and enjoy your reading!

Watchman's Teaching Letter #220 August 2016

This is my two hundred and twentieth monthly teaching letter and continues my nineteenth year of publication. I have resolved to do a series of lessons doing a beneficial critical review of Howard B. Rand’s books, tracts and articles published in his Destiny Magazine.Printed for many years, Destiny Magazine had several guest writers of varying degrees of excellence. I rate Rand and his associate writers about 50%, but some of their articles are simply outstanding.

With this lesson, I will cite an article entitled, “The Iniquitous Empire: A Great Mystery”, by Howard B. Rand found in Destiny Magazine for March, 1950 yearbook, pp. 81-88:

The phenomenal rise of world Communism and the rapid advance of Political Zionism, coupled with the presence of abundant evidence to demonstrate the exercise of pressure from hidden sources and controls over the acts of politicians and governments, reveal the existence of a blueprint for world conquest that is master-minded by the authors of a great world conspiracy.

Watchman's Teaching Letter #219 July 2016

This is my two hundred and nineteenth monthly teaching letter and continues my nineteenth year of publication. At this juncture, I have decided to continue to do critical reviews of Howard B. Rand’s ministerial writings from his books, tracts and especially those found in his Destiny Magazine.The many issues of Destiny Magazines had several guest writers of varying degrees of excellence.

I will inform the reader at the outset that I only rate Rand and his associate writers about 50%. However, the 50% that they get correct is simply outstanding. I would also advise the reader, if one can find any of their original printed articles, to check my edited articles against the original publications. My position is, if anyone who has put anything into writing or speech, they are fair game for a critical review, as it best serves our kinsmen in the faith, and this is what I will be doing with Rand and his associated group of writers.

Who are the Biblical Angels? – A Critical Perspective, (#7)

Category: 

This will be the 7th paper in this series and we will dwell on the subject of “Satan”, as the term is greatly misunderstood, many believing there is no such being known as “Satan”. To start this thesis, I will quote from an unlikely, but in this case, an unbiased source, the 1980 Collier’s Encyclopedia, vol. 8, p. 166, under the general title “Devil”:

... The origin of these demons is traced to the fall of the angelic watchers, the ‘sons of God,’ who corrupted themselves with the ‘daughters of men’ (1st Enoch chs. vi-x, referring to Gen. vi:1-6). The author of the Wisdom of Solomon is the first to identify Satan with the serpent in the third chapter of Genesis (Wisdom of Solomon ii:23-24). Asmodeus, the evil spirit in Tobit iii: 8, probably represents the Devil. His name is ‘Mastema’ in the pseudepigraphical Book of Jubilees, and ‘Sammael’ in III Baruch and the Ascension of Isaiah.

Who are the Biblical Angels? – A Critical Perspective, (#6)

Category: 

In papers #’s 3, 4 & 5 of this series, I have been working under the premise that:

... The only thing that I can imagine is, Yahweh must have given His male angels all of the abilities of His male creations, except the part of the body that produces natural opioids which stimulate the sex drive in humans. Without these, the male angels would have had no desire for sexual intercourse. Evidently, the third of the angels that rebelled against Yahweh and fell found aphrodisiac-stimuli in some type of vegetation to jump-start their sexual desires!”

A few years ago I had written an article entitled The problem With Genesis 4:1, which might fit in quite well with our present topic! In that exposé, I cited three sufficient sources to demonstrate that Gen. 4:1 had been corrupted somewhere along the line, as the context doesn’t harmonize with the rest of Scripture.

The KJV reads: “And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.”

William Finck, researching the Hexapla found further evidence that Gen. 4:1 is ambiguous:

William is referring to my paper, The Problem With Genesis 4:1, and interprets this evidence thusly:

Announcements

Now available on CD are each of the first 6 years of Clifton A. Emahiser's Wantchman's Teaching Letters, professionally narrated by Dan Adams.


Watchman's Teaching Letters for 1998


Watchman's Teaching Letters for 1999


Watchman's Teaching Letters for 2000

 

Click here to buy now!
Click the blue button to buy all 6 CDs now!

 


Watchman's Teaching Letters for 2001


Watchman's Teaching Letters for 2002


Watchman's Teaching Letters for 2003

 

Click here to buy now!
Click the blue button to buy all 6 CDs now!

 

Pages