I know that this is not the favored view among today’s lethargic clergy. I also know that the majority of the religious hierarchy make the claim that the people migrating to Palestine today calling themselves “Israel” are a fulfillment of prophecy. But in order to make such a declaration, it is necessary to make the prophet Jeremiah a liar, for he prophesied just the opposite, and Yahshua Christ Himself upheld Jeremiah by cursing the barren fig tree. Furthermore, He told those usurpers: “Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof”, Matt. 21:43. What was the nation to which the kingdom would be given? And is the Almighty an Indian-giver to take the kingdom back from that nation to which the kingdom was “given” and award it to the usurpers? I say “usurpers”, as the people claiming to be “Judahites” or “Israelites” immigrating to Palestine today are by-and-large a hodgepodge mixture of Edomite, Canaanite and Kenite extraction who have mingled themselves with many other races over the centuries. Those calling themselves “Jews” are neither Israel nor Judah! They are not the legitimate descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob! Actually, the Kenite admixture which these people have flowing in their veins goes back to one of their progenitors, Cain, and that makes them literally the children of Satan! And I will go one step further; anyone who says otherwise than I have stated here, is a false prophet and will reap a reward of wood, hay or stubble, 1 Cor. 3:12!
Inasmuch as the Old Jerusalem will never rise again, it might be well to look to the New Jerusalem, for the New Jerusalem is not the Old Jerusalem which is now defunct! Let’s now take into consideration Jeremiah’s oracle where he prophesied that Jerusalem would never be put back together again, at 19:1-11, which reads: “1 Thus saith Yahweh, Go and get a potter’s earthen bottle, and take of the ancients of the people, and of the ancients of the priests; 2 And go forth unto the valley of the son of Hinnom, which is by the entry of the east gate, and proclaim there the words that I shall tell thee, 3 And say, Hear ye the word of Yahweh, O kings of Judah, and inhabitants of Jerusalem; Thus saith Yahweh of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will bring evil upon this place, the which whosoever heareth, his ears shall tingle. 4 Because they have forsaken me, and have estranged this place, and have burned incense in it unto other gods, whom neither they nor their fathers have known, nor the kings of Judah, and have filled this place with the blood of innocents; 5 They have built also the high places of Baal, to burn their sons with fire for burnt offerings unto Baal, which I commanded not, nor spake it, neither came it into my mind: 6 Therefore, behold, the days come, saith Yahweh, that this place shall no more be called Tophet, nor The valley of the son of Hinnom, but The valley of slaughter. 7 And I will make void the counsel of Judah and Jerusalem in this place; and I will cause them to fall by the sword before their enemies, and by the hands of them that seek their lives: and their carcases will I give to be meat for the fowls of the heaven, and for the beasts of the earth. 8 And I will make this city desolate, and an hissing; every one that passeth thereby shall be astonished and hiss because of all the plagues thereof. 9 And I will cause them to eat the flesh of their sons and the flesh of their daughters, and they shall eat every one the flesh of his friend in the siege and straitness, wherewith their enemies, and they that seek their lives, shall straiten them. 10 Then shalt thou break the bottle in the sight of the men that go with thee, 11 And shalt say unto them, Thus saith Yahweh of hosts; Even so will I break this people and this city, as one breaketh a potter’s vessel, that cannot be made whole again: and they shall bury them in Tophet, till there be no place to bury.”
What is there about the words “cannot be made whole again” that we don’t seem to understand? Thus, Jerusalem became like Humpty-Dumpty; having a great fall, and all the king’s horses and all the king’s men couldn’t put Old Jerusalem back together again! If you don’t believe this interpretation of Jeremiah here, I would suggest you obtain an earthen pottery bottle that has been fully cured by fire and take and smash it on a smooth concrete floor where one could vacuum up all the broken pieces and small slivers, and get a quantity of crazy-glue and put it back together in a condition as though it had never been broken. It couldn’t be done in Jeremiah’s day and it still can’t be done today, and Jeremiah meant every word he said, and he uttered it in the name of Yahweh! And what is one to do when some of the pieces of that broken bottle are so small that it would be necessary to have a microscope in order to see them? All of it boils down to this: Do we believe what the Bible says, or don’t we? This is not the only Bible passage these false prophets are lying about!
Let’s consider a comparable passage in Daniel that they also take completely out-of-context, at 2:35: “Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshingfloors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them ...” Here the iron represents the Roman empire, the brass Greece, the silver Medo-Persia and the gold Babylon. All of these empires have been reduced to chaff, yet many of the false prophets claim that the Roman empire will be “revived”. For those who don’t believe what Daniel prophesied here, they should get a pair of tweezers and a magnifying glass and go out and follow a combine at wheat harvest and see how much chaff he can restore to each wheat kernel. That would mean it would be necessary to collect all the minute pieces of chaff and restore them to the exact kernel of wheat from which they came, and again a microscope would be necessary to see some of the tiny pieces of chaff. Try it sometime and see how far you get! The Roman empire, like Old Jerusalem, has been broken into tiny microscopic pieces and will never be restored! Either Daniel meant what he said, or he didn’t!
I shall now endeavor to show you from where all this false prophecy is coming. I will quote excerpts from a book entitled Israel In Bible Prophecy by John L. Bray. Bray didn’t understand Israel Identity and had several misconceptions as a result, and parroted some of the usual churchified dogma. But we have to give credit to the man for he researched areas where others fail to go. I would rate him about 40% overall, but on the topic of futurism, which I am about to quote from him, he is right on target:
Page 30- “Where, then, did this teaching originate? Or more specifically, where did the emphasis on these teachings first begin?
“A number of authors credit J.N. Darby of the beginning Plymouth Brethren movement with the origin of this ‘futurism’ which has gained such a foothold in conservative circles during these last 150 years or so. However, little notice has been paid to the Catholic Jesuit priest Emmanuel Lacunza and his book, The Coming of the Messiah in Glory and Majesty (published in English in 1827 in London) with its possible influence on Darby and the translator of the book from Spanish, Rev. Edward Irving. This book was published in 1812 in Spanish, and later translated by Rev. Edward Irving into English in 1826 and published in London, England, in 1827. It had been written by Lacunza under the assumed name of Rabbi Juan Josaphat Ben Ezra as a supposedly converted Jew. (I have xeroxed copies of all 960 pages of this very rare book in my possession, including the long preface by Irving). The main emphasis of Lacunza in this book was the return of Christ to set up a millennial earthly kingdom (whether 1,000 or 100,000 years made no difference to Lacunza!) and the conversion of the Jews, etc., following the return of Christ to earth. It was in the days following the publication of this book that the system of a futuristic restoration of the Jews to Palestine and their national conversion at the second coming of Christ to the earth, began to be emphasized and spread abroad everywhere. I noted that Darby was well acquainted with this book as I read The Collected Writings of, J.N. Darby, Prophetic No. 1, vol. 2, as he discussed the viewpoint found in Lacunza’s book in his first section entitled, ‘Reflections Upon the Prophetic Inquiry and the Views Advanced by It.’ He specifically mentions Lacunza’s book with its views as the occasion for his own discussion of the subject. This section was written by Darby in Dublin, in 1829, just two years after publication of Lacunza’s book in English. ...”
Page 72- “Emmanuel Lacunza, a Jesuit Catholic priest, writing under an assumed name as a converted Jew in his The Coming of the Messiah in Glory and Majesty (published 1812, in English 1827) [writing] about such, does not make it so. John Nelson Darby, following Lacunza’s lead, writing about such, does not make it so. And all the Scofield Reference Bible notes (which some people seem to think almost inspired) on this subject do[es] not make it so! ...”
Page 28- “Some say that Zechariah’s prophecy of the restoration of the Jews [sic Judahites] from Egypt and Assyria and far countries was a prophecy made after the Jews [sic Judahites] were already back in the Land, and therefore had to apply to our future. And indeed, J.N. Darby said this same thing as he discussed Immanuel Lacunza’s teachings in the book, The Coming of the Messiah in Glory and Majesty, right in the beginning of his several books on prophecy. (Lacunza was the one who influenced many toward a revived belief in an earthly Jewish future kingdom following the second coming of Christ ...
“When I first read what Darby said, I realized that many Bible students must read things like that (by him and others) and accept them as gospel truth without ever doing any real investigation or further study on the matter themselves.”
This is far from exposing the entire plot of the origin of “futurism”, but it will have to suffice for this short essay. I will, though, state this: many of the catholic jesuit priests were indeed Canaanite-jews.
The next thing we must understand is the character of the man promoting all of this, Cyrus Scofield. The following information is from the website:
[Note: I should point out to the reader that I’m not in agreement with “The Greatest Hoax; A Study Of The Inconsistent Theology Of Modern Day Bible Prophecy” by Charles Samples, with his anti-Paul remarks found on this website, but on the subject of Cyrus Scofield and his satanic connections, they are right on target.]
“And Who Was Cyrus Scofield?
“As a young con-artist in Kansas after the Civil War, he met up with John J. Ingalls, an aging Jewish lawyer who had been sent to Atchison by the ‘Secret Six’ some thirty years before to work the Abolitionist cause. Pulling strings both in Kansas and with his compatriots back east, Ingalls assisted Scofield in gaining admission to the Bar, and procured his appointment as Federal Attorney for Kansas. Ingalls and Scofield became partners in a railroad scam which led to Cyrus serving time for criminal forgery.
“While he was in prison, Scofield began studying the philosophy of John Darby, pioneer of the Plymouth Brethren movement and the ‘any moment now’ rapture doctrine.
“Upon his release from prison, Scofield deserted his first wife, Leontine Carry Scofield, and his two daughters Abigail and Helen, and he took as his mistress a young girl from the St. Louis Flower Mission. He later abandoned her for Helen van Ward, whom he eventually married. Following his Illuminati connections to New York, he settled in at the Lotus Club, which he listed as his residence for the next twenty years. It was here that he presented his ideas for a new Christian Bible concordance, and was taken under the wing of Samuel Untermeyer, who later became chairman of the American Jewish Committee, president of the American League of Jewish Patriots, and chairman of the Non-sectarian Anti-Nazi League.
“Untermeyer introduced Scofield to numerous Zionist and socialist leaders, including Samuel Gompers, Fiorello LaGuardia, Abraham Straus, Bernard Baruch and Jacob Schiff. These were the people who financed Scofield’s research trips to Oxford and arranged the publication and distribution of his concordance.
“It is impossible to overstate the influence of Cyrus Scofield on twentieth-century Christian beliefs. The Scofield Bible is the standard reference work in virtually all Christian ministries and divinity schools ... And it is precisely because Christians persist in this belief that they remain blind to the reality of [false] Zion[ism].
“Scofield served as the agent by which the Zionists paralyzed Christianity, while they prepared America for our final conquest.
“‘Journal M, November Term, A.D. 1883, 8th day of December, 1883
“‘Leontine Scofield Plaintiff Vs C. I. Scofield Defendant
“‘Now comes the plaintiff by her attorneys Tomlinson and Griffin and the defendant enters for appearance and files answer and makes no further appearance. And thereupon this cause came on for hearing upon the pleadings and testimony and was argued by counsel upon consideration whereof the Court does find that the defendant has been guilty of wilfull abandonment of the plaintiff for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action.
“‘It is therefore adjudged and decreed by the Court here that the marriage relation heretofore existing between the said parties be and the same is hereby set aside and wholly annulled and the parties wholly released from the obligations of the same.
“‘It is further ordered and decreed that the custody, nurture, education and care of the said minor children Abigal Scofield and Helen Scofield, be and the same, is hereby given to the said plaintiff and the said defendant is hereby forever enjoined from interfering with or disturbing the said plaintiff in the custody, care, nurture and education of the said above named children until the further order of this Court.’
“Cyrus Scofield had several other incidents of a downright dishonest nature after he supposedly became saved. The fact that in 1892 he began calling himself ‘Doctor Scofield’ without producing any Doctorate degree from any Seminary or University is the least of his devious activities. Even the details he gave in his story of conversion are proven to be fabricated, including the time, place and other particularities, thereby placing doubt on the whole story.
“He was a self-promoter in every sense of the word, even lying about being able to comfort and calm the entire city of Belfast, Ireland with a sermon he delivered there the Sunday after the Titanic sunk [sic sank].
“His behind-the-scenes handlers [Untermeyer, Gompers, Baruch, Schiff, etc.] saw to it that his swindles and schemes were swept under the rug and that only a positive image of him was promoted, especially an exaggeration of his Biblical knowledge and wisdom. Men like 33rd degree freemason George Bannerman Dealey, owner of the Dallas Morning News and member of Scofield’s church contributed greatly to the cause.
“But occasionally, newspapers who weren’t loyal to his cause would put out damaging information on him. Here is an excerpt from the Topeka newspaper The Daily Capital dated August 27, 1881:
“‘CYRUS I. SCHOFIELD IN THE ROLE OF
A CONGREGATIONAL MINISTER
“‘Cyrus I. Schofield, formerly of Kansas, late lawyer, politician and shyster generally, has come to the surface again, and promises once more to gather around himself that halo of notoriety that has made him so prominent in the past.
“‘The last personal knowledge that Kansans have had of this peer among scalawags, was when about four years ago, after a series of forgeries and confidence games he left the state and a destitute family and took refuge in Canada.
“‘For a time he kept undercover, nothing being heard of him until within the past two years when he turned up in St. Louis, where he had a wealthy widowed sister living who has generally come to the front and squared up Cyrus’ little follies and foibles by paying good round sums of money.
“‘Within the past year, however, Cyrus committed a series of St. Louis forgeries that could not be settled so easily, and the erratic young gentleman was compelled to linger in the St. Louis jail for a period of six months.
“‘Among the many malicious acts that characterized his career was one peculiarly atrocious, that has come under our personal notice. Shortly after he left Kansas, leaving his wife and two children dependent upon the bounty of his wife’s mother, he wrote his wife that he could invest some $1,300 of her mother’s money, all she had, in a manner that would return big interest.
“‘After some correspondence he forwarded them a mortgage, signed and executed by one Charles Best, purporting to convey valuable property in St. Louis. Upon this, the money was sent to him. Afterwards the mortgages were found to be base forgeries, no such person as Charles Best being in existence, and the property conveyed in the mortgage fictitious’ ...”
“Scofield’s work continues to be praised and utilized today by men with questionable motives. His closely guarded reputation remains intact and this information provided will only be useful to the truth-seekers, which represents a relatively small percentage of Christendom. At least two scriptures are applicable at this point:
“‘For there is no respecter of persons with God’, Romans 2:11.
“‘Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them’, Matthew 7:20.
“Scofield abandoned his wife and children and refused to support them. I Timothy 5:8 says ‘But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.’ When his first wife Leontine originally filed for divorce in July 1881, she listed the following reasons:
“... ‘(he had) ... absented himself from his said wife and children, and had not been with them but abandoned them with the intention of not returning to them again ... has been guilty of gross neglect of duty and has failed to support this plaintiff or her said children, or to contribute thereto, and has made no provision for them for food, clothing or a home, or in any manner performed his duty in the support of said family although he was able to do so ...’
“Scofield began courting his future second wife Hettie van Wark before the divorce was finalized and they got married only three months after it was. His divorce was finalized at least four years after he became ‘born again’.” (Note: Scrutinize the preceding carefully!)
Thus we see that the false doctrine of futurism is part of Satan’s agenda; brought upon us by the same people who brought us the Civil War; World Wars I & II; the Federal Reserve; income tax; communism; the great depression of 1929; the United Nations with all of its police actions; abortion; and a racial program to genetically destroy forever the White Caucasian Israel Race!