Alphabetical Listing of Papers

Daniel Prophesied The Roman Catholic Church

Category: 

This is not a treatise to condemn anyone who was born and raised in Catholicism. I would say from the start that some of the Catholics I have known are among the finest hardworking, moral and honest people I have dealt with. Not only that, but there are a few Roman Catholics who have exposed the great Jewish” conspiracy, such as William Guy Carr, Charles E. Coughlin and other conservative Catholics who weren’t afraid to speak out and take a stand for justice, for whom I have the highest respect. Neither is this a composition to gloss over Protestantism, for Protestantism is nothing more than warmed-over Catholicism. I view these religious systems as stages we’ve gone through in our deserved Israelite punishment of seven times, or 2,520 years since being taken captive by Assyria. Rather, this theme is a brief effort to determine how we have arrived at where we now stand.

Daniel prophesied at Dan. 7:24-25: 24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings. 25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.”

You will notice that this earthly power was to last until a time and times and the dividing of time”. A time” in Scripture is 360 years, so this amounts to 360+720+180 or 1260 years, not 3½ calendar years as some maintain. Since this exceeds man’s life span, it is not speaking of one individual man, but there are key men involved.

Death of a Kingdom and Rebirth of Another

Category: 

UPDATED  July 1,  2006 

You may be wondering: Why the above title? As you will see later, the words are well chosen. It is a subject where, for a lack of thorough study, many find themselves completely bewildered. To study the New Testament without first mastering the content of the Old is like building a house without a foundation. So it is with the topic we are about to take under consideration. The Death Of A Kingdom & Rebirth Of Anotheris a New Testament fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies. Because of men’s fanciful reasoning, and without being thoroughly established in the whole Word, it is simply amazing the baseless doctrines which have been concocted with the 24th chapter of Matthew. It is the objective here, once we have exhaustively examined this passage, we will never again have any misgivings concerning this and related Scripture. The premise for the 24th chapter of Matthew is laid in the passages as follows:

Jeremiah 26:18: “Micah the Morasthite prophesied in the days of Hezekiah king of Judah, and spake to all the people of Judah, saying, Thus saith Yahweh of hosts; Zion shall be plowed like a field, and Jerusalem shall become heaps, and the mountain of the house as the high places of a forest.” (Covered with trees instead of houses.)

Micah 3:12: “Therefore shall Zion for your sake be plowed as a field, and Jerusalem shall become heaps, and the mountain of the house as the high places of the forest.”

You may be wondering: What do these two verses have to do with Matthew 24, anyway? To show the significance, I will present a running verse by verse commentary of this chapter. Before we get started, though, we need to take under advisement three different views of prophecy: (1) Futurists, who project all prophecy into the future, (2) Praeterists who claim all prophecy was fulfilled by 70 A.D., and, (3) Historicists, who see prophecy as a continuing unfolding panorama. Upon the first Bibles being circulated during the Reformation, the Roman Church was seen as anti-Christ. To avoid the heat, one Jesuit priest projected prophecy forward and another Jesuit priest projected it into the past. The “Futurists” hold the last week of Daniel’s 70 weeks prophecy was never fulfilled; they chop it off from the other 69 weeks and propel the last week 2000 years into the future when they predict (1) a “rapture”, and then, (2) either a three and a half or seven year period of tribulation representing Daniel’s 70th week. We need to know all this because these various opinions affect the interpretations of Matthew 24.

Did Esau Receive The Birthright & Blessing Instead Of Jacob?

Category: 

This may seem like a very strange question to ask, but according to the clergy today this is, in essence, what they are claiming. You will probably, in all likelihood, declare you have never heard any of them ever make such a statement. But, I believe before we are finished, you will have to agree that they have made the allegation suggested in the above title many times.

Chances are, you have often heard the Bible story about Esau selling his birthright to Jacob for a mess of red lentil pottage. No doubt, you are very familiar with the story of how Jacob’s mother, Rebekah, disguised him so Isaac would believe he was Esau, and therefore confer the blessing on Jacob instead of Esau. Anyone who has any Bible training at all knows, beyond all doubt, that it was Jacob who received the blessing. Yet, the mainstream clergy continue to insist that it was Esau who received the blessing. The reason the mainstream clergy continue to make such a false claim is because they have never taken the time to identify the true Esauites and the true Jacobites. Maybe, if “we” can identify the descendants of Esau, called Edomites, then possibly we can recognize the true descendants of Jacob, called Israelites.

Diverse Seeds Defile Families Downline Forever & Is Incurable!

Category: 

We are about to address the Bible’s most serious offense. Everywhere in the Old Testament the Hebrew word for “seed”, “sperm” or “descendant” (i.e., “offspring”) is Strong’s #2233 “zera”, except Lev. 19:19 and Deut. 22:9, where the Strong’s #3610 is used for “seeds”, “diverse kind”, “mingled seed” and “mingled”; (once for “seeds” at Deut. 22:9, and three times as “diverse kind”, “mingled seed” and “mingled” at Lev. 19:19) in the KJV. These two passages, with their four occurrences, are an exception to the rule concerning “seeds” rather than “seed”.

Quoting these verses from e-Sword, with words for Strong’s #3610 underlined along with each of the four KJV renderings:

Deut. 22:9: “Thou shalt not3808 sow2232 thy vineyard3754 with divers seeds3610: lest6435 the fruit4395 of thy seed2233 which834 thou hast sown,2232 and the fruit8393 of thy vine- yard3754, be defiled6942.” [This would apply to man as well.]

Lev. 19:19: “Ye shall keep8104+853 my statutes2708. Thou shalt not3808 let thy cattle929 gender7250 with a diverse kind3610: thou shalt not3808 sow2232 thy field7704 with mingled seed3610: neither3808 shall a garment899 mingled3610 of linen and wool- en8162 come5927 upon5921 thee.” [This would apply to man as well.]

#H3610 is rendered “divers seeds”, “diverse kind”, “mingled seed”, and “mingled”. #H3610 is an interesting Hebrew word used to denote such “seed”! It is derived from the dual form of #H3608 which means “a prison”. It would appear that what we have here are two individual seeds with dissimilar genetics, imprisoned or locked into one capsule from which neither can escape. In other words, “two, of a twofold kind” imprisoned in a single person, animal or plant.

Early Celtic Church Taught Physical Seduction Of Eve!!

Category: 

Most of you are aware of the extensive research I have done on the subject of Two Seedline. I will now present solid evidence that Two Seedline is no new doctrine as some so cocksurely insinuate. I get this testimony from the book The Celtic Church In Britain by Leslie Hardinge, in a chapter entitled “The Role of the Scriptures”, page 48. Though Hardinge does not trace the Celtic Church back to the Church set up at Glastonbury by Joseph of Arimathea about five years after the Passion, he does, however, quite well after 400 A.D., and proficiently documents his material. In this chapter he demonstrates the various methods of teachings used by the Celtic clergy. One of those methods was a question and answer liturgy of which the following is an authentic specimen (answers in parentheses):

Who died but was never born? (Adam) Ÿ Who gave but did not receive? (Eve, milk) Ÿ Who was born but did not die? (Elias and Enoch) Ÿ Who was born twice and died once? (Jonas the prophet, who for three days and three nights prayed in the belly of the whale. He neither saw the heavens nor touched the earth) Ÿ How many languages are there? (Seventy-two) Ÿ Who spoke with a dog? (St Peter) Ÿ Who spoke with an ass? (Balaam the prophet) Ÿ Who was the first woman to commit adultery? (Eve with the serpent) Ÿ How were the Apostles baptized? (The Saviour washed their feet).

Early Church Era On Two Seedline

Category: 

Many are under the impression that the early church knew nothing concerning the doctrine of Two Seedline, and that it is not a Biblical doctrine. Nothing could be further from the truth! The Celtic Church of Britain (a church not dominated by Rome) was well aware of the doctrine of Two Seedline! And the Celtic Church was the second assembly after Jerusalem.

I get this testimony from the book The Celtic Church In Britain by Leslie Hardinge, in a chapter entitled “The Role of the Scriptures”, page 48. Though Hardinge does not trace the Celtic Church back to the Church set up at Glastonbury by Joseph of Arimathea about five years after the Passion, he does, however, quite well after 400 A.D., and proficiently documents his material. In this chapter he demonstrates the various methods of teaching used by the Celtic clergy. One must remember that the common people didn’t have Bibles in those days, and a good many couldn’t have read a Bible had they had one, so the clergy of that day had to use innovative methods of teaching what the Word said. One of those methods was a question and answer liturgy, of which the following is an authentic specimen (answers in parentheses):

 

Who died but was never born? (Adam).

Who gave but did not receive? (Eve, milk).

Who was born but did not die? (Elias and Enoch)

Who was born twice and died once? (Jonas the prophet, who for three days and three nights prayed in the belly of the whale. He neither saw the heavens nor touched the earth).

How many languages are there? (Seventy-two).

Who spoke with a dog? (St. Peter).

Who spoke with an ass? (Balaam the prophet).

Who was the first woman to commit adultery? (Eve with the serpent).

How were the Apostles baptized? (The Saviour washed their feet).

(Hardinge cites from R. E. McNally, The Bible in the Early Middle Ages, 38-9, a translation of Ms. 908, “The Ioca monachorum”, an eighth-century Celtic text.)

Early Rain vs. Latter Rain

Category: 

 

Unless one finds the origin of a subject, one will invariably arrive at illogical conclusions. Such is the nature of the theme we are about to illustrate. In fact, it would be difficult to find another topic so nearly wrenched out of shape. We find reference to this topic at James 5:7: Be patient therefore, brethren, unto the coming of the Master. Behold, the husbandman waiteth for the precious fruit of the earth, and hath long patience for it, until he receive the early and latter rain.”

Here the early and latter rain represent firstly the rain of seed time at planting and secondly the rain of ripening before the harvest: the first fell in Judaea about the beginning of our November after the seed was sown; the second toward the end of our April as the ears began filling out in preparation for the full harvest, as their crops developed during the winter and early spring. It is obvious that this passage typifies the beginning of the ekklesia period and extends until the time of Yahshua’s Second Advent, with a long dry season between the two rains. Most good farmers are aware that a moderate dry spell after the seed has been planted can be beneficial, causing the plants to develop a vigorous root system so that when the rains finally come the crop will produce an abundant yield.

This may be a strange way to look back on the history of the ekklesia, but this is what James and the prophets before him were alluding to. The reader needs to differentiate between the early and latter rain, as each are different in their respective nature. In other words, we are not instructed to reenact the events at the Day of Pentecost as a pattern of our worship. While there were miraculous phenomena at Pentecost, as recorded in Acts (such as speaking in tongues), it was only an earnest (down payment) of the Spirit. At the Day of Pentecost there were gathered many good-fig-Judahites from many lands speaking diverse languages, and a miracle was provided in both the speaking and the hearing for that event to be a success. The present-day Pentecostal and charismatic movements have made a mockery of the original happenings recorded at Acts 2. Nor do the present-day Pentecostals and charismatics allude to Old Testament passages in order to explain why a Pentecost in the first place. Pentecost in the Old Testament was a feast day mandated for Israelites only, whereas today’s Pentecostals and charismatics invite every unclean race to gather with them.

Pages