Alphabetical Listing of Papers

"Adam" in the Hebrew in Genesis






The following are both the Hebrew from Bible Works “WTT, BHS Hebrew Old Testament”, [4th edition], and the English from the KJV which clearly proves (not merely suggests) that the “man” (Adam) of Genesis 1:27 is the same “man” (Adam) of Genesis 2:7-8 and the other verses presented here:

Genesis 1:27

27 ויברא אלהים את-האדם בצלמו בצלם אלהים ברא אתו זכר ונקבה ברא אתם

A Jewish Time-Line: Exodus from the Eastern Hemisphere to the Americas, (North, South & Central)


This is a critical review of Jacob Neusner’s Exodus To America: A Jewish Time-Line. Neusner seems to do quite well generally, and he takes most of his information from The Jewish Encyclopedia. However, we are instructed by Christ Himself to “beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees” (Matthew 16:6), and that the Canaanite-Edomites amalgamated with the Canaanite tribe of the “Kenites” (Genesis 15:19) converted to Judaism (Josephus’ Antiquities 13.9.1) were liars, being the children of the devil (John 8:44)! Therefore, we must be careful when quoting from the Canaanite-jews! There are three distinct entities which we should not group together, and they are, (1) the house of pureblooded Israel, (2) the house of pureblooded Judah, and (3) the house of the mixed-blooded Kenite-Edomite-jews converted to Judaism by John Hyrcanus near 125 B.C., and all the mixed-blooded proselytes they the (Kenite-Edomite-jews) have picked up along the way, even up until today!

A King James Version Bible With A Good Center Reference Teaches And Proves Two Seedline

If you have a King James Version Bible with the proper center reference, you can very readily prove Two Seedline teaching with it, for it will take you from one supporting verse of Scripture to another almost endlessly on the subject. Not that the KJV is an especially advisable Bible to use for study, as it is alleged to contain approximately 27,000 translation mistakes.

A Letter I had written to Eli James, Dan Johns and Dick Ford in June of 2003


This is a Letter I had written to Eli James, Dan Johns and Dick Ford in June of 2003, showing how early my differences with Eli on certain issues have existed.

June 23, 2003

Clifton A. Emahiser

1012 North Vine Street

Fostoria, OH 44830

Ph. (419)435-2836

Only to:

Eli James,

Daniel Johns,

Dick Ford,

I am sorry about the meeting cancellation! The problem seems to have been caused by one Charles Claud (maybe spelled Clawd), General Post Office, Strasburg, North Dakota, 58573. He uses the post office at Linton, ND 58552 to mail his literature. He calls himself “the Christ’s assembly of North Dakota.” In short, he’s bad news. He called me on three occasions asking the most absurd questions. On the last call, Friday, June 20, and toward the end of the conversation, out of the clear blue sky advised me that I better not attend that meeting! I acted like I never heard of any meeting, but he insisted there was one scheduled in Ohio. He seemed to know more about it than I did!

A Truth Hidden For 2,700 Years


At the present, this age-old truth is not for everyone, although given time each and every person will be confronted with it. At this juncture, you are probably wondering what kind of truth could be hidden from people for over 2,700 years. The answer is: “God” hid it, and when “God” hides something, it’s hidden until He reveals it. You are probably thinking, “surely if it has something to do with ‘God’, my pastor or priest would know something about it!” Yes, most pastors do understand part of the story, but generally, the entire truth to them is an enigma.

Today, the Almighty is choosing a few of His people to witness to this truth, and unless He opens our eyes, in spite of our best efforts, we will not be able to comprehend it (pastor or layman alike). Therefore, if one desires to understand more, one must pray to Him for knowledge and guidance. As the Bible instructs, we are to “study to show thyself approved”, 2 Tim. 2:15 (not one’s pastor). This puts the responsibility for exploring this “hidden truth” squarely on each individual. Thus, if they wish to be honest and just, the eligible and approved have no alternative but to test the validity or falsity of this age-old mystery.

Adam Clarke’s 6-Volume Commentary Declares: “Devil” & “Ape” Have The Same Name

Should one neglect to identify the Biblical “beast of the field” as being the “devil”, one is inviting one’s son, daughter, grandson, or granddaughter to take one as an intimate companion (and a terrible misfit at that)! A “misfit”, as an entity, is one not suited to his position or associates; a maladjusted alien unfit for companionship. So if one desires to have some “devils” hanging from one’s family tree, just keep watching the “devils” running up and down the football fields and basketball courts, or whatever other activities the “devils” engage in! Just continue to support the games the “devils” engage in, and they’ll end up engaging in sexual intercourse with one’s daughter or son! And woe to the Israel Identity pastors who continue to claim that Yahweh God created those “devils”, and that He proclaimed them as “good” in the first chapter of Genesis!

Again, I will show evidence that the “devil” and the “ape” have the same name! Also, that “Satan” is likened to an “orangutan”. To document this, I will use Adam Clarke’s 6-volume Bible Commentary, vol. 1, pp. 47-50, under “Notes On Chapter III”, and especially on the terms “nachash” and “beast” at Genesis 3:1.

Adam's Commission, #1


With this paper, we’ll take up the subject of Adam’s commission found at Genesis 1:26 and Genesis 1:28 which reads as follows: “26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth .... 28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish [rather, fill] the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.”

We have a very interesting situation with this passage, for we have the actual creation of Adam-man at verse 27, sandwiched between his commission defined at verses 26 & 28. Therefore, this places Adam right at the heart, the very epicenter of his appointed vocation. He is enclosed entirely within it. Hence, there is no way he can avoid doing the job he was created for! Yet there are those in Israel Identity who dance up and down declaring that Genesis 1:27 is the creation of the non-Adamic races! Should that be true – and thank the Almighty it’s not – the non-Adamic races would have the commission of subduing the White Adamic race! Yet, when someone ruptures their distorted premise, they fume, bristle, fuss, and rage to no end!

Adam's Commission, #2


This is the second in a series on this topic, and how many papers will be necessary to adequately cover all the implications and ramifications is hard to determine at this point. I should point out that if you haven’t read Adam’s Commission, #1, you may not fully comprehend entirely what will be presented in this second issue. Previously, it was pointed out that Adam’s commission is to be found at Genesis 1, verses 26 & 28, with the creation of Adam sandwiched in-between at verse 27.

Some of those holding to the 6th & 8th day creation theory contend that Adam’s commission is to rule over the other races! They take Psalm 2:8 completely out-of-context where it says: “Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.” They assume we are to inherit the other races as a work force, but rather the heathen are going to be destroyed, and we will receive their lands as our “possession.” Psalm 2 has nothing to with us inheriting the non-Adamites. Psalm 2:1 is quoted by Peter at Acts 4:25: “Who by the mouth of thy servant David hast said, Why did the heathen rage, and the people imagine vain things?” Again at Acts 13:33, Psalm 2:7 is cited: “God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children, in that he hath raised up Yahshua again; as it is also written in the second psalm, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee.” It should be perfectly clear at 2:7 that David is speaking of our Messiah. The question arises, then, if the “Son” at verse 7 is Yahshua our Redeemer, who or what is “thine inheritance” at verse 8? At Acts 2:29-30 we are informed that David was a prophet, and his prophecy at Psalm 2:7 of Christ validates that fact. So we must ask again, is the entire passage of Psalm 2 in the future in respect to David’s time? Hence, if David meant Yahshua at Psalm 2:7, who are we to change it to “us”? So who inherits who or what? Thus, it’s not who we are going to rule, but who the Christ is going to rule, and it’s not the “other races” or “heathen.” I’m often amazed where all these people come up with all of their harebrained ideas! Adam was assigned segregation rather than leadership over the non- Adamic peoples!